Interview with Wommack

Whatever public spin Nutt put on the situation, let's face it: in the win at all cost SEC state university world, if Wommack was any kind of superior DC, Nutt would have kept him, no matter what else was in play.

Okay jackass, I have been following this thread and I know a helluva lot more about Arkansas than you do because that is the other team I root for.

Nutt got rid of his OC Gus Malzahn, who is more or less recognized as a genius and who was the guy behind all of the innovative offensive stuff they were doing with McFadden. There wasn't a damned thing wrong with Malzahn. Nutt is a dumb/jackass and you stepped in it trying to support your point by saying he wouldn't do something stupid.

For me that calls into question everything else you said, if you were that painfully and obviously wrong about something I do know about.
 
Thank you for the expert facts, Jacketup. But you sound kind of pissy, you must be PMS'ing pretty hard. Yeah, I guess someone else hurled the first insult at you. Something about a mute button. But your witty comebacks slam all of Stingtalk. Take a motren, the heavy flow and cramping will end soon, Nancy.
 
At the end of last season I noticed that there was really not a game in which an offense just totally picked apart our defense, something that happened at least once (or more) a year with Tenuta. Tenuta's D played many incredible games for us, and won us a fair share of games too, but there was always a game or two every season where they were just completely picked apart.

Uh, did you see Stafford, Massaquoi, and Green pick us apart at the end of last year?

Not sure what you were smoking at the end of last season, but please give me some.
 
:biggthumpup:
1. Wommack was FIRED as DC at Arkansas.

2. He then went to South Carolina as an assistant (not DC) where he was FIRED after 2 years.

3. He then went to So. Miss where he was an assistant, not DC.

4. Paul Johnson hired him from So. Miss. He was not Johnson's first choice.

There are plenty of reasons to question Wommack, but don't let the facts get in the way of hurling insults at posters who are trying to educate the inbreds.

I again return you to your discussions on uniform colors.


I thought we looked great White on White last year!:biggthumpup:

Wommack has one year under his belt. Thought he did a good job. We'll see how the season goes this year.

Not making any excuse for anything but it seemed the D really went in the wrong direction after Jefferson and Word Daniels got injured.

Feel most of our problems on D came from a lack of depth.

It's interesting looking at our D from the BC game as compared to UGA and LSU later in the season. We seem so much slower and less aggressive. Not knocking the guys, but could tell the season had given us a beat'n. That's the way it looked to me anyway.

Let's build depth, and give the guys a chance to see what they do with this scheme.

We've got a year under us with Wommack! We have better depth, but it's young up front.

Think this D will be better than lasts years even though we've lost three from the DLine.

Where we must improve a great deal is on special teams. That's the biggest ?!

GO Jackets!!
 
Apparently I am the only guy in this thread that watched the last 5 games of last season, or at least, the only guy in this thread that understood what he was seeing from the defense.

Are you aware of how many DB's we were missing at the end of last year? Just as a reminder, our top 2 CB's were gone (JWD and Tarrant) and one starting safety was hobbled (Reese). Much of the time we were playing two TRUE FR: Reid and Taylor, and a RS-FR: Peterson, along with Burnett and Butler.

Contrast that with the experience and talent that CJT had most of this years:
2002: Collins (SR), Muyres (SR), Cox (JR), Hester (SR)
2003: Landry (SO), Butler (JR), Cox (SR), Houston (SO)
2004: Landry (JR), Butler (SR), Houston (JR), Scott (SO)
2005: Landry (SR), Reis (SR), Scott (JR), Davis (SR)
2006: Jones (SO), Lewis (JR), Scott (SR), Roberson (JR)
2007: Jones (SR), Lewis (SR), JWD (JR), Roberson (SR)

2008: Burnett (SO), Reese (SO), Butler (SO), JWD (SR),
...turned into...
Burnett (SO), Taylor (FR), Butler (SO), Reid (FR)

... meaning that we essentially traded a SR and a R-SO for two true FR.

Never did you see CJT start a FR, until 2007 after Jones went down, and that FR was Burnett. Last year, Wommack was stuck starting 2 true FR the bulk of the year.

Personnel-wise it's tough to compare the two groups, especially when the latter group includes the missing players and true FR that it does.
 
Lets face it our entire team last season barely had something that could be called depth. The only position on defense that had some depth was linebacker and that's where injuries hit us the worst on defense. The secondaries depth was almost non-existent and our DL's depth wasn't any better than it is now (which is one step above a "O ****" moment). I'd say last year saw the some of the worst results of the scholarship reduction and was probably made worse by the people who jumped ship when Paul Johnson was hired.
 
I would agree that almost all of our early performances on D were better than the last six games, except for Miami.

But, I would argue FSU, UVA, UNC, UGA, and LSU had far better offenses than Jax St, BC, GW, MSU, Clemson, and even Va Tech.

Particularly the offensive talent at UNC, LSU, and UGA was outstanding last year.
 
I would agree that almost all of our early performances on D were better than the last six games, except for Miami.

But, I would argue FSU, UVA, UNC, UGA, and LSU had far better offenses than Jax St, BC, GW, MSU, Clemson, and even Va Tech.

Particularly the offensive talent at UNC, LSU, and UGA was outstanding last year.

He's got a point except for UVA and UNC. UNC wouldn't of scored over 20 if we hadn't of given them the ball in our own territory. The UVA game seemed like our entire team didn't seem properly focused (though maybe thats just me) and UVA's OC used playcalling and a running back with a magic stiff arm to score on us.
 
jacketup vbmenu_register("postmenu_201494", true);
Jolly Good Fellow

Join Date: May 2002
Location: home
Posts: 591


icon1.gif
Re: Six Straight against his arch-Rival...
If Johnson is hired at GT, he will not beat a Richt coached Georgie team. Ever.

Option offenses are great when you have more talent than the other team. That is why Alabama and Nebraska ran them in the 70's. They don't work against superior teams that are well coached--just like Gailey's conservative offense never beat Richt.

Hiring Johnson insures more losses to the Georgie.



^ This is all you need to know about Jacketup, and how much his opinion on football means.
I have never seen a positive post about Tech from jacketup, unless it was defending Tenuta after he left GT.
Jacketup, I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.
 
Last edited:
jacketup vbmenu_register("postmenu_201494", true);
Jolly Good Fellow

Join Date: May 2002
Location: home
Posts: 591


icon1.gif
Re: Six Straight against his arch-Rival...
If Johnson is hired at GT, he will not beat a Richt coached Georgie team. Ever.

Option offenses are great when you have more talent than the other team. That is why Alabama and Nebraska ran them in the 70's. They don't work against superior teams that are well coached--just like Gailey's conservative offense never beat Richt.

Hiring Johnson insures more losses to the Georgie.



^ This is all you need to know about Jacketup, and how much his opinion on football means.
I have never seen a positive post about Tech from jacketup, unless it was defending Tenuta after he left GT.
Jacketup, I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.

Meh, I just ain't gonna listen to him anymore. He obviously doesn't know anything, and I am sticking to that.

Jacketup.....you are officially on mute for doubt Paul Johnson and being DEAD WRONG! Go to the Hive they need more WRONG people to post there.
 
^ This is all you need to know about Jacketup, and how much his opinion on football means.

Well it looks like GTBandid22 just gave jacketup the intarweb equivalent of an atomic wedgie.

Job well done, Bandit.
 
Jacketup:

Since you have such a problem with WOmmack's defensive "scheme", then what defensive "scheme" would you run? Remember this "scheme" would have to include the fact that you have only sophmores and freshmen in the secondary. Go for it. I am all eyes.
 
At the end of last season I noticed that there was really not a game in which an offense just totally picked apart our defense, something that happened at least once (or more) a year with Tenuta. Tenuta's D played many incredible games for us, and won us a fair share of games too, but there was always a game or two every season where they were just completely picked apart.

What about UGA? They killed us on O.
 
Jacketup:

Since you have such a problem with WOmmack's defensive "scheme", then what defensive "scheme" would you run? Remember this "scheme" would have to include the fact that you have only sophmores and freshmen in the secondary. Go for it. I am all eyes.
He has no clue, he just wants to hear something different.
 
I'd just like to post these two comments right next to one another for effect.

Jacketup on Stingtalk posters:
By the comments in this thread, Stingtalk posters continue to demostrate the lowest football IQs of all the GT boards. Most people who have football knowledge have moved away from this board because they are attacked by posters who love to swim in their self created mire of ignorance. Most Stingtalk regulars are like a bunch of backwoods close minded inbreads who cast dispersions on outsiders due to a fear of their own inadequacies.

Jacketup on his knowledge of football:
If Johnson is hired at GT, he will not beat a Richt coached Georgie team. Ever.

Option offenses are great when you have more talent than the other team. That is why Alabama and Nebraska ran them in the 70's. They don't work against superior teams that are well coached--just like Gailey's conservative offense never beat Richt.

Hiring Johnson insures more losses to the Georgie.
 
Back
Top