Austin Barrick

Nashville Jacket

Dodd-Like
Joined
Jul 20, 2009
Messages
7,818
Is anyone else as impressed with Barrick as I am? He came to Tech as a TE, but after CPJ was hired the TE position became obsolete. He tried the A-back position for a while, but now he's a starting OT. Does his versatility make him one of he better athletes on the team?
 
Is anyone else as impressed with Barrick as I am? He came to Tech as a TE, but after CPJ was hired the TE position became obsolete. He tried the A-back position for a while, but now he's a starting OT. Does his versatility make him one of he better athletes on the team?

I don't know about all that, but he might be one of the most improved players on offense. Last season he looked like a bulked up TE playing on the offensive line. Now he looks more like a real lineman and seemed much better at it when I watched in the spring.
 
I talked with him a few weeks ago and he said he is loving his spot on the O-line. I know he was a bit frustrated being moved around but now he seems to have found his niche. I expect a HUGE season out of this kid.
 
I hope he makes the NFL. I just want to see the behind the player story when they talk about him trying A-back.
 
What's with those unedited interviews from Roberson? You'd think they would clean up the language and everything a little bit.
 
Is anyone else as impressed with Barrick as I am? He came to Tech as a TE, but after CPJ was hired the TE position became obsolete. He tried the A-back position for a while, but now he's a starting OT. Does his versatility make him one of he better athletes on the team?

The spread offense requires that the OT's are athletic. Rarely is an OT required to "base block". Instead, many of the blocking assignments require releases off the LOS to block LB's and/or downfield (safety/cb/etc.).

I will give one example .....

When CPJ was OC @ GSU in the '80's. In 1984, GSU's first year of Div I-AA football, the spread Triple-O was installed. Fred Stokes was a Tight End. He would ultimately be converted to an OT (like Barrick). A few years later, he was drafted as an Athlete in the NFL. He played DE, primarily as a pass rush specialist, for 11 years.

Yes - the OT's must be fairly athletic. Thru my years, some true OL fit the bill, but often times, oversized (and athletic ... 4.8/4.9) TE's or LB's performed very well in the role.

Then again, all of the OL's in this offense must be more athletic that the typical "wallow blocking" OL's found in most offensive schemes.
 
Is anyone else as impressed with Barrick as I am? He came to Tech as a TE, but after CPJ was hired the TE position became obsolete. He tried the A-back position for a while, but now he's a starting OT. Does his versatility make him one of he better athletes on the team?

Brad Sellers too?
 
Is anyone else as impressed with Barrick as I am? He came to Tech as a TE, but after CPJ was hired the TE position became obsolete. He tried the A-back position for a while, but now he's a starting OT. Does his versatility make him one of he better athletes on the team?

Saw in in the ugag game last year. Might have good hands as a TE but he would be best in the "hook and ladder" play. He must have 7.0 speed.
 
What exactly is the "ladder" part of a "hook and ladder" play? Is it just a mispronunciation of "lateral" or what?
 
I guess ladder is short for lateral or pitch. Before the term hook and ladder came along, we ran it in HS and called it flea ficker right or flea flicker left. There is nothing new under the sun.
 
From Wikipedia:

"Hook and Ladder"
The "hook and lateral" is sometimes referred to as a "hook and ladder," which is a topic of considerable debate among football fans and analysts. Although the terms are used interchangeably by some, others believe this is not technically accurate. "Hook and lateral" may actually be a newer, more descriptive term for the play. However, since it is so commonly referred to as the "hook and ladder", perhaps this is actually an equally correct term for the play.
One well known iteration of the play came in the aforementioned 1981 AFC playoff game, when the Dolphins surprised the Chargers and sent the Orange Bowl crowd into a frenzy.
“We called it 87 Circle Curl Lateral,” says Don Strock, the quarterback for the Dolphins that night (notice the name of their play didn't even include the word "hook"). “And, believe me, the damn thing never worked in practice.”
In current culture, the play is referred to as the "hook and ladder" on the cover of EA Sports NCAA Football 2008, possibly because the term has been used commonly by sportscasters, coaches and fans for years.

Speculation on Origins of Play Names

Some proponents of the term "hook and lateral" claim that the "hook" refers to the pattern run by the receiver who catches the pass from the quarterback. The "lateral" refers to the pitching of the ball by the receiver to his teammate. This is not synonymous with a "ladder", which is a specific route (also called a "chair") in which a receiver cuts out before turning up the field along the sideline. If the "hook" receiver laterals the ball to a teammate running a ladder route, the play could accurately be described as a "hook and ladder."[citation needed] This would not be true of many hook and lateral plays; in the case of the play run by the Boise State Broncos in the 2007 Fiesta Bowl, the player who received the lateral from the "hook" receiver was running a slant route across the center of the field rather than a ladder route.
On the January 2, 2007 broadcast of ESPN's Around the Horn, sportswriter Woody Paige claimed, perhaps facetiously, that the name "hook and ladder" originated with NYC Firemen Football Team in Hell's Kitchen, New York. This was in response to the other panelists ridiculing his use of "hook and ladder" rather than "hook and lateral." The next day, Jay Mariotti claimed the phrase "hook and ladder" referred to coal mining in Pennsylvania in the 1930s — his research claims that coal miners need a hook and ladder when trapped in a mine. Another possible explanation is that "hook and ladder" is just a corruption of the phrase "hook and lateral."
A "hook and ladder" is a common name for a firetruck, which used to carry various hooks and ladders. The analogies that could be drawn to this play based on a "hook" route (with or without an actual "lateral") and a "hook and ladder" apparatus are numerous. Long extension ladders include two or more pieces, perhaps the first piece being a "hook" route, and the second piece being a run up the "ladder" to the end-zone. The second part of the play is sometimes accomplished with a hand-off, and not a lateral at all. Notwithstanding, there does not seem to be any definitive proof of what the play was originally called or why.



Full Article at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hook_and_ladder
 
What exactly is the "ladder" part of a "hook and ladder" play? Is it just a mispronunciation of "lateral" or what?

It's an old guy's term for when the receiver catches the ball and then immediately pitches the ball to someone else. In the ugag game Austin looked like his feet got stuck in wet concrete after he caught that pass. :-)
 
Back
Top