# 1: Tucker Gleason

GTCrew said:
Its possible we go 3-9 in a transition year like this. That is ööööing irrelevant.
Click to expand...

CGC has the talent to go bowling next season. He really needs to take advantage of that as 2020 will be a very tough season, and two seasons below .500 will not make for good recruiting.
 
gtphd said:
CGC has the talent to go bowling next season. He really needs to take advantage of that as 2020 will be a very tough season, and two seasons below .500 will not make for good recruiting.
Click to expand...

We're gonna recruit good this year and next year and we will be competitive 3rd season in for CGC and company, how competitive I have no idea. I expect this year might depend how they do in grad transfer mkt after spring ball. "cruitin" is carrying me next couple years, I don't have high W/L expectations these next 2 yrs.
 
Looks like he has decent speed and runs tough. That's important to most college offenses these days, and even more so when there are issues on the OL.
 
We are going to be very happy with Gleason on the flats. He is a perfect fit for GT (wants to be an engineer), is huge (he looks like a LB in person) and has a great arm. He will enroll early so I expect him to be no worse than 3rd string after spring, probably #2 on the depth chart. We lose this kid to Stanford or UF without coach Collins here.
 
TampaBayJacket said:
We are going to be very happy with Gleason on the flats. He is a perfect fit for GT (wants to be an engineer), is huge (he looks like a LB in person) and has a great arm. He will enroll early so I expect him to be no worse than 3rd string after spring, probably #2 on the depth chart. We lose this kid to Stanford or UF without coach Collins here.
Click to expand...
Not to rehash these same arguments, but Temple was better than us. The Citadel and Pitt are the ones I would like to have back, plus you could make an argument for UVA which makes 6.
 
Jacketeer said:
Not to rehash these same arguments, but Temple was better than us. The Citadel and Pitt are the ones I would like to have back, plus you could make an argument for UVA which makes 6.
Click to expand...

If we have UVA + Citadel + Pitt, we'd have finished the season with 7 wins.
 
Good lord we are going to be good. We haven't had a QB that has looked like that since.....well ...never.
 
JoeCakeEater said:
#biGTtime arm on this kid. Effortlessly slinging it 30+ yards downfield. His OL isn't really holding up, but he's still making great throws downfield. I'm really looking forward to Tucker on the flats.

Click to expand...


I was half watching it about the 6:45 minute mark and thought I saw him kick a FG. Got really excited about that.

But agree with all the above. He looks like he could start for us now.
 
Moves a lot like Bryce Perkins. Not very explosive as a runner but runs big. I like his arm better than Perkins too
 
Reminds me of Carson Wentz, but more physically developed for his age.

Can't scout much off highlights, but he has a good release and the ball comes off his hand effortlessly. Arm obviously strong enough. Appears to have good vision, but highlights. Appears to have good leadership. Liked his throw rolling out to the left.
 
BuzzedATL said:
Moves a lot like Bryce Perkins. Not very explosive as a runner but runs big. I like his arm better than Perkins too
Click to expand...

I don't want him to have to run unless absolutely necessary. If he's slinging it like Elway, and handing off to the likes of Howard, Griffin, Mason, and anyone else riding the juice train, then the element of surprise with an occasional run, scramble is gravy.
 
His size really helps on those 3rd and 2s that need a beast type to power over.He looks the part.At 185 Graham is not a beast--quick but light..
 
Graham will be playing another position his Sr year. He’s a bridge QB right now. Kids like Gleason are the future. For Graham’s sake, I hope we recruit enough QB’s to allow him to play something else by his Sr year. Otherwise, he’s destined to be a backup leaving us to wonder, “What if?”
 
originalwombat said:
Graham will be playing another position his Sr year. He’s a bridge QB right now. Kids like Gleason are the future. For Graham’s sake, I hope we recruit enough QB’s to allow him to play something else by his Sr year. Otherwise, he’s destined to be a backup leaving us to wonder, “What if?”
Click to expand...
Not necessarily. Graham has the skills to be a great QB if he continues to develop. There’s a potential we could see Gleason redshirting next year and moving to the starting role as a RS Junior.
 
AT 6'3 & 220, P'nut better design a ööööing QB Sneak from under-center play. 4th & 1 - let this kid sneak it. NOT FROM THE ööööing SHOTGUN, P'nut!!
 
ramblin_wreck08 said:
Not necessarily. Graham has the skills to be a great QB if he continues to develop. There’s a potential we could see Gleason redshirting next year and moving to the starting role as a RS Junior.
Click to expand...
At the beginning of the year I would've thought Graham is a throw away starter this year and we build around Gleason next year (Gleason is that good, I've seen him in person). However, Graham has shown enough flashes that I think he has a big upside too. Will be interesting to see the QB depth chart evolve from spring through fall.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top