ACC Standings

GTWannaBee

Dodd-Like
Joined
Aug 11, 2006
Messages
7,567
With the new “no divisions” format, Tech is all of a sudden in third place in the ACC with tonight’s win. 99% not happening, but if Tech were to win out and Louisville lose to Miami (possible) and Virginia (extremely unlikely), Tech would play FSU in the ACCCG.
 
With the new “no divisions” format, Tech is all of a sudden in third place in the ACC with tonight’s win. 99% not happening, but if Tech were to win out and Louisville lose to Miami (possible) and Virginia (extremely unlikely), Tech would play FSU in the ACCCG.
Wouldn’t BC need to lose once more too?
 
BC‘s last 3 are:
11/11 VT - 12 pm ACCN
11/16 (Thurs) @ Pitt - 7 pm ESPN
11/24 (Fri) Miami - 12 pm ABC

More than likely the only possible loss is vs Miami after Thanksgiving.
 
With the new “no divisions” format, Tech is all of a sudden in third place in the ACC with tonight’s win. 99% not happening, but if Tech were to win out and Louisville lose to Miami (possible) and Virginia (extremely unlikely), Tech would play FSU in the ACCCG.
If we had only beat L'vill .... like we should have. Sigh
 
NCST vs UM means one of those will fall off.
VT vs BC means on those will fall off.
Duke vs UNC means one of those will fall off.
At most that means we end with (4) 2 loss teams. Depending on winners of those games there could be further filtering that is guaranteed.
NCST plays VT and UNC.
UM plays BC
I’m drunk otherwise I setup a binary search function to make this a little more explicit.
 
Screenshot_20231105-115359~2.png
 
Thursday night probably cements the ACC Championship game. FSU (clinched) vs. Louisville (with a win over UVA Thursday night).
 
Tiebreak steps for 3 or more 2 loss teams (obviously if UL & GT are only two 2 loss teams, UL goes to ACC championship)
  1. Combined head-to-head win-percentage among the tied teams if all tied teams are common opponents
  2. If all the tied teams are not common opponents, the tied team that defeated each of the other tied teams
  3. Win-percentage versus common opponents based on their order of finish and proceeding through other common opponents based upon their order of finish
  4. Combined win-percentage of conference opponents
  5. The tied team with the higher ranking by the Team Rating Score metric provided by SportSource Analytics following the conclusion of regular season games
  6. The representative shall be chosen by a draw as administered by the Commissioner or Commissioner’s designee
 
Tiebreak steps for 3 or more 2 loss teams (obviously if UL & GT are only two 2 loss teams, UL goes to ACC championship)

6. The representative shall be chosen by a draw as administered by the Commissioner or Commissioner’s designee

Well, if we happen to find ourselves in this scenario and the tiebreaker goes all the way to #6, GT is screwed.
 
Tiebreak steps for 3 or more 2 loss teams (obviously if UL & GT are only two 2 loss teams, UL goes to ACC championship)
  1. Combined head-to-head win-percentage among the tied teams if all tied teams are common opponents
  2. If all the tied teams are not common opponents, the tied team that defeated each of the other tied teams
  3. Win-percentage versus common opponents based on their order of finish and proceeding through other common opponents based upon their order of finish
  4. Combined win-percentage of conference opponents
  5. The tied team with the higher ranking by the Team Rating Score metric provided by SportSource Analytics following the conclusion of regular season games
  6. The representative shall be chosen by a draw as administered by the Commissioner or Commissioner’s designee
Starting next year, with the 27 conference teams or however many it is and still only 8 conference games, I could see tie-breakers becoming more common.
 
Seems another option is a 3 way tie (with 2 losses) between UofL and UNC) I think we win that given the common opponents are Miami and UVA
 
Back
Top