Some of those numbers just don't make sense do they? Maryland and Rutgers revenue and expenses are exactly equal? NCSU has expenses of only about $10M? Temple had revenues of only $6M?
That's why I don't take a lot of these too seriously. They obviously aren't reporting the same way at every school.
How does a GT and a NC both have revenues of $30 million, Tech loses a $1 million, and NC nets $9.5 million playing in the same conference and supports the same sports.
Is it mismanagement of revenues or is there some big differences between the expenses of the two schools?