Using game data for teams in the six BCS automatically qualifying conferences (ACC, Big East, Big Ten, Big XII, PAC, SEC) from 2005-2012, we find clear evidence of officiating bias, most notably in the ACC and former Big East and, to a lesser degree, in the Big Ten and Big XII. Interestingly, evidence of bias varies between conferences. For instance, we found evidence that ACC officiating favors underdog teams, home teams, high prestige football programs, and long-time founding members of the conference. We found no evidence of this type or level of officiating bias in other conferences. We believe these findings help substantiate claims of bias from around the nation and provide a compelling case for considering centralized governance of officiating in college football to alleviate concerns surrounding gambling and game integrity