BuzzMD
Dodd-Like
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2007
- Messages
- 6,828
Washington was impressive, the center-Shaw exchange was sloppy is a good summary of it, apparently to me.
http://www.macon.com/169/story/665112.html
Okay, ignorant football question -- if the snaps are bad from center-Shaw, but okay for Washington, Coley makes it appear that it is the center's fault, but why would they be okay for Washington then? Is it Shaw? (Note--I am not trying to bash Shaw or say Washington needs to be 2nd string--CPJ will decide that) I am just asking a question about the center-QB exchange. Why target the center when the 3rd string QB did not have the fumbles?
http://www.macon.com/169/story/665112.html
A redshirt freshman from Alabama, Washington’s running ability impressed Johnson Saturday, while his arm was also impressive. Washington delivered a 43-yard touchdown pass to senior A-back Jonathan Malone, before weaving his way to a 38-yard option keeper run. Washington finished the day 3-for-3 pasing for 73 yards.
“Tevin’s hard to tackle, he surely is,” Johnson said. “He’s a good runner, and he really seems to make plays. Physically, he’s always had tools. He’s a good athlete, he just has to get the mental part of it down. He’s definitely a hard guy to tackle, though, there’s no question about that.”
The reason that could prove worrisome for Johnson is because of the difficulties the players, particularly McRae and Fraysier, have had snapping the ball this spring to backup quarterback Jaybo Shaw.
Bad snaps marred Shaw’s performances in drills earlier in the week and were again a problem in his first series Saturday. On two plays during the sophomore’s opening drive, botched snaps resulted in fumbles. After the second one, McRae, who was at center at the time, was replaced by Fraysier.
“You’re going to have some of that,” Johnson said of the bad snaps, adding that one of the redshirt freshmen hadn’t even played center before last Monday’s practice.
While the center-to-quarterback exchange was shaky for Shaw and the backup linemen, it appeared to be strong for presumed third-string signal-caller Washington.
Okay, ignorant football question -- if the snaps are bad from center-Shaw, but okay for Washington, Coley makes it appear that it is the center's fault, but why would they be okay for Washington then? Is it Shaw? (Note--I am not trying to bash Shaw or say Washington needs to be 2nd string--CPJ will decide that) I am just asking a question about the center-QB exchange. Why target the center when the 3rd string QB did not have the fumbles?