attendance was DOWN last year....

Simply replacing Gardner-Webb and Duke on the home slate will raise attendance. I'm curious as to the attendance per game. How far did Gardner Webb pull us down?
UGA, VT and maybe UNC will be sellouts IMO. Clemson is almost a lock to sell out. The Clemson fans think Dabo is the man, and we'll be a top 15 team when we face them.
 
Simply replacing Gardner-Webb and Duke on the home slate will raise attendance. I'm curious as to the attendance per game. How far did Gardner Webb pull us down?
UGA, VT and maybe UNC will all be sellouts IMO. Clemson is almost a lock to sell out. The Clemson fans think Dabo is the man, and we'll be a top 15 team when we face them.

If we aren't then we will have a much bigger problem than fillin the seats....
 
If we aren't then we will have a much bigger problem than fillin the seats....

If we aren't, that means we lost to Jax State. We will start preseason top 15, and play Clem's son next. It's also the Thursday nighter, so ESPN won't let us down with the hype machine.
 
Simply replacing Gardner-Webb and Duke on the home slate will raise attendance. I'm curious as to the attendance per game. How far did Gardner Webb pull us down?

Average with all games - 47489

Average FBS - 48957

Average daytime - 47476

Average night time - 47520
 
...I'm curious as to the attendance per game. How far did Gardner Webb pull us down?
UGA, VT and maybe UNC will be sellouts IMO. Clemson is almost a lock to sell out.

2008 home attendance:

Jax St- 45,706
Miss St- 48,402
Duke- 46,104
G Webb- 41,929
UVA- 47,416
FSU- 53,528
UM- 49,335


2007 home attendance:

Samford- 43,288
BC- 51,112
CU- 54,635
Army- 50,242
VT- 52,202
UNC- 45,490
UGA- 54,990

2007- 5 games 50K+
2008- 1 game 50K+
 
2008 home attendance:

Jax St- 45,706
Miss St- 48,402
Duke- 46,104
G Webb- 41,929
UVA- 47,416
FSU- 53,528
UM- 49,335


2007 home attendance:

Samford- 43,288
BC- 51,112
CU- 54,635
Army- 50,242
VT- 52,202
UNC- 45,490
UGA- 54,990

2007- 5 games 50K+
2008- 1 game 50K+
That almost shows me that we play better traveling teams on the odd years. Other then BC, all the schools with the 50K+ travel well. Well, I'll admit, I don't know about Army. But Clem, VT and those awful mutts all come out of the woodwork for games. I'll chalk the BC attendance up to the hype surrounding that game. We were a top 15 team, expected to start cruising through the ACC, and we flopped.

I'm sure that attendance will once again be up this year. Does anyone have 2006's numbers?
 
2006 home attendance:

ND- 56,680
Samford- 47,149
Troy- 45,637
UVA- 51,081
MD- 51,686
UM- 55,320
Duke- 46,768

Total: 354,321
Avg. 50,617
Wow, that very nearly shot my theory to ****. I guess I can explain away the ND game, and the UVA was that glorious Thursday night throwback game, but the Terps getting 50K+ surprises me. Maybe there is a residual lethargy in place from Gailey's last season...
 
Wow, that very nearly shot my theory to ****. I guess I can explain away the ND game, and the UVA was that glorious Thursday night throwback game, but the Terps getting 50K+ surprises me. Maybe there is a residual lethargy in place from Gailey's last season...

We were leading the ACC Coastal in 2006. You would expect the attendance to climb each game. If we make another run at the coastal title AND lead the division the whole time, our attendence will improve again.
 
If we aren't, that means we lost to Jax State. We will start preseason top 15, and play Clem's son next. It's also the Thursday nighter, so ESPN won't let us down with the hype machine.

That was what I meant by us having bigger problems at that point than attendance.
 
On the flipside, this years attendance should be way up. We've got Clemson, VT and Ugag at home as well as coming off a 9 - 4 season.

The question will be how much of an increase in season ticket sales?

Exactly! season ticket sales are a better measure of the attendance, if you're looking at the impact of CPJ's hiring on tickets. Overall attendance is skewed by the crappy teams that we played at home.
 
Back
Top