<font size="2" face="Arial, Verdana, Sans-Serif">Step back and think about all of the articles you have read from Mark Bradley and then decide whether or not you should automatically NOT agree with anything he says. Bradley can be a great barometer for me because he is an absolute idiot.Originally posted by fatjacket:
I hate to say it, but I think Bradley's article was right on. I agree with it totally.
<font size="2" face="Arial, Verdana, Sans-Serif">I hear you but Bradley's article is full of conjecture. He hasn't interviewed Gailey and he hasn't been out to the practices. His point of view is essentially ignorant and he's performed the Tech community a disservice. No news there.Originally posted by fatjacket:
I hate to say it, but I think Bradley's article was right on. I agree with it totally.
<font size="2" face="Arial, Verdana, Sans-Serif">Thanks FatherWasp for your opinion and insight.
That being said, this article, and the last one before it on Tech, as FatJacket says, are right on target.
He simply states the questions most of us Techsters are wondering. I've talked to many people who draw the same inferences - this program has been marked by inconsistency, not consistency.
The part about Bilbo is true. How could he have been evaluating Bilbo since his arrival, to arrived at the decision he was going to replace Suggs, only to reverse course and decide he's going with a true freshman? It's just questions.
Gailey does not appear to have a plan. If he does, it unfolds in strange ways.
Many of us keep trying to find ways to support the guy cause he's our coach but this "wonder what the new day will bring" aura about this program is driving people nuts.
I don't like the guy, but Bradley's article is solid this time.