Bunger Henry, you are a fraud...

[BarrelORum]

Two weeks ago, this was your commentary on UGA's win over Colorado. I can almost hear the sounds of you sucking Richt off while you are singing the Bulldog praises.

...Then there are those teams that when all hope is lost, when everything seems to be going wrong, are just somehow able to dig down deep, dig down into the deepest bowels of the Earth, and extract that one tiny sliver of hope, as bright and hard as a diamond, and pull out the victory when it is needed.
That's the kind of team Georgia seems to be under Mark Richt. How many times have we seen Georgia struggle and still manage to "get lucky." I think about all those "close" games his first couple of seasons. I think of that game against Tennessee when the Vols were on the goalline just before the half, hoping to go up by a nice margin, then fumble on the one and see UGA run it back 99 yards for a TD heading into halftime. UGA just manages to dig down deep when it needs to.
If this had been Gailey, we'd be self-destructing right now, wondering how we got shutout by the worst team in the country. UGA fans might be a little ratttled right now, thinking they just dodged a bullet, the fact is, they have nothing to worry about.

and this is what you had to say about our victory yesterday when responding to the person who asked if any of the critics noticed that Tech came from behind to win the game which was something many thought this team and coach were incapable of doing so..

What has been said is that Tech can't win if a team gets up by "more than 10 points."

How much was Maryland up by? TEN POINTS.

Just... go hide your head in shame somewhere. You are an utter embarrassment to yourself and those who share your thinking. LMAO!!!

and later he insults another Tech fan for celebrating Tennessee's victory over UGA by saying...

It's because they like to live vicariously through other, more successful, teams. They're too gutless to demand excellence from our own.

Wait a minute, you make a comparison to the in state school about how brave a great they are for gutting a victory out but you're so obsessed in your hate for our Coach that you fail to recognize when your own team does the same(and this is debatable as it reeks that you may be a pathetic UGA fan with nothing better to do than posting on a GT board).

You're a Damn imbecile of the 9th degree.

 

[TechGator1066]

What a ööööing douchebag. BBuzzoff is filled with these assholes. However, what do you expect from a guy whose name is BungerHenry? He was born with a bulldawg cock in his mouth.

I'm sorry for the profanity in this post. But, I just couldn't hold it back after reading the moronic quotes from Booger Henry.

 

[TechGator1066]

I also love how those BBuzzoff dickheads rationalize our big wins. I just want to know how they will rationalize our trip to Jacksonville. What a bunch of FAGS.

 

[GGGT]

BOR,

Thanks so much for your well researched post. This is information that he really can't deny or hide from.

Very sad.

Thanks again...and GO JACKETS!

 

[TechGator1066]

Also, thank you for exposing this asshole BOR:greenclap:

 

[Buzz Bomb]

Relocated back to Atlanta after a few years at Vanderbilt and briefly had a chance to look at that web site. I don't know what kind of posters they attract over there, but the following was a cut-n-paste from one of their on-line posts. Unbelievable behavior and certainly nothing to brag about. :rolleyes:

The friends I do have are my friends because they know down deep I don't have any bull crap, I have said things on line that people were shocked to hear, about getting shot at, shooting at other people, taking drugs, screwing other peoples wives, and they get all bent out shape, so be it.

 

[pocket_watch]

However, what do you expect from a guy whose name is BungerHenry?

I don't want you to slow down regarding this angry and unhappy cynic, but there is a building named for Bunger Henry on campus.
That said, just be happy that most are not as bitter as these people. They are pathetic and I feel sorry for them.

 

[TechGator1066]

I don't want you to slow down regarding this angry and unhappy cynic, but there is a building named for Bunger Henry on campus.
That said, just be happy that most are not as bitter as these people. They are pathetic and I feel sorry for them.

Thanks for the info pocket! I seriously did not know that. It makes sense now since that is an incredibly odd username.

 

[Buzz Bomb]

It's the old Chemical Engineering building. I believe ChE has since spread out to other campus buildings, like the Ford Environmental Engr building.

 

[gtGreg768b]

Yeah, Bunger-Henry is a building on campus. It houses the school of Chemical Engineering (last I heard the college of Biomolecular engineering moved over to the ES&T area).

 

[floridajacket]

The ChemE department has now moved over to the "Ford" ES&T building and Bunger Henry is now completely taken over by the ECE department, so that the ECE department now has the two worst buildings on campus, Van Leer and Bunger Henry.

As for the original post, it looks like an attorney embarrassing a witness by using their own words. Throughout the past couple of years, they've yelled on the rooftops that this year would be the train wreck. When the last of GOL's recruits left, they said, GT football was set to implode while fans all tried to burn their season tickets.

Well, after the first half of 2006, here's what's happened instead:

- We're 5-1 and 3-0 in the ACC, and if the season ended today, we would go to Jacksonville.
- We're ranked 13th and 15th in the major polls, a consensus top 15 ranking.
- Instead of the much-cryed-about underutilitization of Calvin, he's now gotten over 100 yards in every game that's really mattered (in other words not Samford or Troy).
- I beleive that every home game has had an attendence of greater than 50,000, except for maybe Samford. Against Maryland, even the upper north started to fill up with Tech fans and our crowd may have also gotten the loudest in the history of BDS on that goal line stand.

So, I have to ask, just how blind can these posters be?! I never really believed the hyperbole that if we won the MNC, that some people would still complain. However, after reading that board today, I'm absolutely convinced they would still hate Chan after an MNC. They would all dance around giving the slightest hint of any kind of credit to Chan. They would probably take out a flaw in our wins and unreasonably magnify it. To be brutally honest, their egos are too precious to admit that they were so horribly, horribly wrong about how this season would turn out, and now they're really grasping at the slightest thing to not look like the fools they are.

 

[ArchiTECH]

The ChemE department has now moved over to the "Ford" ES&T building and Bunger Henry is now completely taken over by the ECE department, so that the ECE department now has the two worst buildings on campus, Van Leer and Bunger Henry.

Honestly, I don't want to hijack the thread, but where is (or was) the Ceramic Engineering Building a long while back? In the late 60s/early 70s, I thought I took "Introduction to Ceremic Engineering" (1 hour course in which you could purchase your one-assignment term paper) in the Bunger Henry Building. Maybe there wasn't an entire building devoted to Ceremic Engineering (aka Bunger Henry) and I actually took the course in the Chemical Engineering Building (Bunger Henry). Anyway, it was taught by the really old prof. that did goofy demonstrations and read us the rules about the necessity of wearing a shirt to class. They were practically giving credit away to intice folks into the major. Man, wish I had seen this whole silicon chip stuff coming.

Ok, back to the actual thread of exposing BuzzOff whiners as dawg ball-lickers (I think that's the general ambience).

 

[Buzz Bomb]

ECE department now has the two worst buildings on campus, Van Leer and Bunger Henry.

You think some of ECE, along with some of the Physics & MSE folks, will ultimately move to the new NanoTechnology building currently under construction? Seems like a logical fit to co-locate some of these folks in order to foster cross-departmental collaboration.

but where is (or was) the Ceramic Engineering Building a long while back?

I can't remember exactly but wasn't Ceramic Engr in the old Textile and Ceramic Engr Building? If so, I believe that building was located in the current grassy area between the Library and Student Center and directly across from Architecture. The old building was torn down several years back, if it's the same one I was thinking about. I could be wrong and perhaps someone will correct me if I erred. My guess is that Ceramic Engr is part of the Materials Science & Engineering department now as that would be a logical place for it.

 

[floridajacket]

Continuing the hijack...

I'm guessing ceramic engineering is now the MSE department, which is located in the Love building.

The nanotechnology building will be extremely multi-disciplinary. Everybody from ME to ECE, Physics, Biomedical and MSE profs will set up in that building. However, the bulk of ECE profs look to stay in Bunger and Van Leer for the time being, although they do plan to tear down that big old lecture hall in Van Leer. I don't think anyone will really miss it.

 

[RamblinPeck]

I can't remember exactly but wasn't Ceramic Engr in the old Textile and Ceramic Engr Building? If so, I believe that building was located in the current grassy area between the Library and Student Center. The old building was torn down several years back, if it's the same one I was thinking about. I could be wrong and perhaps someone will correct me if I erred. My guess is that Ceramic Engr is part of the Materials Science & Engineering department now. That would be a logical place for it.

That would have been the Hightower building, tore it down around 2001, I was still in school at the time. Building was a hell hole, but had some cool history, like NBC broadcasting from the top of it during the olympics, and the toxic pit underneath it (and still underneath it) where they used to dump chemicals for years... if you ever wonder why yellow jacket park doesnt drain well, its cause theres a thick layer of concrete covering that just under the soil.

 

[Buzz Bomb]

Didn't they build a Microelectronics building immediately adjacent to Van Leer? Is that part of EE or Computer Science, or both? After being away from the campus for several years, I was amazed at the extent of construction on the North part of the campus and to the East of the Interstate (Technology Square). The expansion is really impressive.

 

[Bunger Henry]

BOR,

I stand by all those quotes. And by the way, thanks for reading.

First of all, Georgia under Richt does not lose to clearly inferior teams. When they lose, it is to a clearly superior team. It's a sign of a well-coached team.

Secondly, it is just a simple fact of life that Tech under Gailey has not come from behind by more than 10 points to win the game. That's a sign of a poorly motivated team.

Lastly, taking joy in your rival losing to someone else's team because your own team is not good enough to do it themselves is just pathetic. Demand your own team become good enough to do it. Don't rely on other teams.

As for being a fraud, BOR, you are the one who bashes Gailey one day, then praises him the next. That's more fraudulent than anything I've said.

And for those who want to use profanity toward my moniker... the Bunger-Henry might be the biggest, ugliest, meanest building on campus, but it's been standing for many decades and will be standing for many decades to come. It occupies prime real estate on Tech campus. It makes no apologies. It just stands there, ugly and imposing, and does its job.

 

[mm42]

First of all, Georgia under Richt does not lose to clearly inferior teams. When they lose, it is to a clearly superior team.

So when 13-1 UGAg lost to 8-5 Florida in 2002, Florida was the "clearly superior" team? Florida? Who lost to Ole Miss and was blown off the field 36-7 by LSU, 41-16 by Miami, and and 31-14 by FSU? "Clearly superior"? Really?

And in 2003, when 11-3 UGAg lost to 8-5 Florida, Florida was the "clearly superior" team? Florida? Who lost to Ole Miss and was destroyed by Iowa, the 5th-place Big Ten finisher?

I don't recall anyone calling 7-5 Auburn and 7-5 Boston College "clearly superior" to Richt's 8-4 2001 squad either. Can you explain what made them "clearly superior"?

 

[floridajacket]

First of all, Georgia under Richt does not lose to clearly inferior teams. When they lose, it is to a clearly superior team. It's a sign of a well-coached team.

Georgia also has had worlds of talent and depth. This year, which is really the first year where Gailey's had reasonable depth, we've only lost to ND. Maybe not a great team, but certainly not a "clearly inferior" team.

Secondly, it is just a simple fact of life that Tech under Gailey has not come from behind by more than 10 points to win the game. That's a sign of a poorly motivated team.

You're straining at gnats with this "10 points" definition. Is UGA's 13 point comeback versus Colorado, a team clearly inferior to Maryland, that much better than a 10 point comeback? Yesterday, Gailey did what he was asked to do, win the ball game. Maybe they weren't motivated enough in the beginning, at least on special teams, but they were motivated enough in the end to win and be 5-1 right now.

Lastly, taking joy in your rival losing to someone else's team because your own team is not good enough to do it themselves is just pathetic. Demand your own team become good enough to do it. Don't rely on other teams.

The "because" here is a huge non sequitur. What tells you that we're only taking joy in Georgia's losses because we've lost to them the past few years? Did we take any less joy in the late 90s?

As for being a fraud, BOR, you are the one who bashes Gailey one day, then praises him the next. That's more fraudulent than anything I've said.

BOR changed after he saw some coaching changes and after recruiting picked up. He was addressing your clear double standard with regards to what standards you have with Richt and the standards you have with Gailey.

Yes, Richt has been much more successful the last four years. But the past is the past, and at this point this year, GT is now ranked higher in one poll than UGA, in the driver's seat for Jacksonville and has an incredible recruiting class. He pulled out a win against an inferior team when nothing went right, similar to how UGA has accomplished 9+ win seasons the last few years.

By the way, thanks for coming on here and defending your views. Just don't confuse "disagreeing" with "silencing" or "banning," as buzzoff has habitually done with respect to the Hive and Stingtalk.

 

[ASimPerson]

You think some of ECE, along with some of the Physics & MSE folks, will ultimately move to the new NanoTechnology building currently under construction? Seems like a logical fit to co-locate some of these folks in order to foster cross-departmental collaboration..

To further continue this hijack, many ECE (most the CompE) professors are currently on the 3rd floor of the CoC and will be moving to the new Klaus building after it opens in a few weeks.

ECE is such a huge deptarment...it's not like Van Leer is small (compared to most Tech buildings - they could all stand to be taller) and they're spread out amongst a ton of buildings.