Cheer up folks

USCJacket said:
So in other words, because they were close? You win and lose in the trenches, and UofL dominated along the LOS on 3rd and 4th down. And dominated against the run making GT one dimensional. After the blocked FG for a TD, there was no threat of the RPO.
Click to expand...
They didn’t make us one-dimensional. We chose to be 1-dimensional. You were watching SC-Michigan.
 
Akinji07 said:
We’re winning out the rest of our ACC schedule including Miami and beating uga and then playing ACCCG. Season isn't over. We’re not a pretend factory fanbase, we still got a lot of football left and a much needed break coming up next weekend.
Click to expand...

 
GTCrew4b said:
They didn’t make us one-dimensional. We chose to be 1-dimensional. You were watching SC-Michigan.
Click to expand...
How much did you drink? GT ran for 98 total yards. You do realize this is a run first offense, right?

www.espn.com

Louisville 31-19 Georgia Tech (Sep 21, 2024) Box Score - ESPN

Box score for the Louisville Cardinals vs. Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets NCAAF game from September 21, 2024 on ESPN. Includes all passing, rushing and receiving stats.
www.espn.com www.espn.com
 
USCJacket said:
How much did you drink? GT ran for 98 total yards. You do realize this is a run first offense, right?

www.espn.com

Louisville 31-19 Georgia Tech (Sep 21, 2024) Box Score - ESPN

Box score for the Louisville Cardinals vs. Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets NCAAF game from September 21, 2024 on ESPN. Includes all passing, rushing and receiving stats.
www.espn.com www.espn.com
Click to expand...
You keep quoting box scores. Admit it you tool: you watched SC-Michigan. Just go to the SC message board to commiserate with them.

WE had no creativity in the run game at all. We chose not to push the ball downfield at all. When we did we were successful. Extremely bizarre game and majorly frustrating for those of us who actually watched/listened.
 
GTCrew4b said:
You keep quoting box scores. Admit it you tool: you watch SC-Michigan.
Click to expand...
I have 2 TV’s and watched both. But hey, keep stating BS. I guess 98 yards, 23 of which in 1 run in the 1st quarter isn’t an indication of being neutralized. GT was one dimensional. UofL stacked the box and forced GT to run, and failed to convert on 3rd and 4th and shorts were proof. But whatever makes you feel better.
 
USCJacket said:
I have 2 TV’s and watched both. But hey, keep stating BS. I guess 98 yards, 23 of which in 1 run in the 1st quarter isn’t an indication of being neutralized. GT was one dimensional. UofL stacked the box and forced GT to run, and failed to convert on 3rd and 4th and shorts were proof. But whatever makes you feel better.
Click to expand...
What you’re saying doesn’t even make sense. They stacked the box and forced us to run??? We chose to continue running between the tackles. Please go chat with SC fans.
 
GTCrew4b said:
What you’re saying doesn’t even make sense. They stacked the box and forced us to run??? We chose to continue running between the tackles. Please go chat with SC fans.
Click to expand...
They did not respect the run in obvious run situations. 3rd and 4th and short. So they stacked the box showing man coverage, knowing GT wasn’t going to try a quick pass, but instead run the ball despite the fact GT could not get the running game going ALL game. This has been a trend as pointed out vs Georgia State and Syracuse. The FSU game was fools gold. But I’m sure that still hasn’t resonated with you.
 
USCJacket said:
I have 2 TV’s and watched both. But hey, keep stating BS. I guess 98 yards, 23 of which in 1 run in the 1st quarter isn’t an indication of being neutralized. GT was one dimensional. UofL stacked the box and forced GT to run, and failed to convert on 3rd and 4th and shorts were proof. But whatever makes you feel better.
Click to expand...
It's like you're defending the play calling. I'm not sure if you're serious, delusional, or drunk.
 
H-town said:
It's like you're defending the play calling. I'm not sure if you're serious, delusional, or drunk.
Click to expand...
Not defending the play calls. I think GT is doing a disservice by not having a short yardage package under center on 3rd, 4th and short. But yes. I have had a few beers starting around 7 pm. Haha
 
USCJacket said:
They did not respect the run in obvious run situations. 3rd and 4th and short. So they stacked the box showing man coverage, knowing GT wasn’t going to try a quick pass, but instead run the ball despite the fact GT could not get the running game going ALL game. This has been a trend as pointed out vs Georgia State and Syracuse. The FSU game was fools gold. But I’m sure that still hasn’t resonated with you.
Click to expand...
Sooo we chose to be 1-dimensional? Kinda exactly like I said?
 
Akinji07 said:
We’re winning out the rest of our ACC schedule including Miami and beating uga and then playing ACCCG. Season isn't over. We’re not a pretend factory fanbase, we still got a lot of football left and a much needed break coming up next weekend.
Click to expand...

It’s like I don’t even know you anymore. Solid poast!
 
USCJacket said:
Where are you fabricating this? GT’s only lead was 7-0. Just so you can read that for yourself, here you go.

www.espn.com

Louisville 31-19 Georgia Tech (Sep 21, 2024) Play-by-Play - ESPN

Play-by-play action for the Louisville Cardinals vs. Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets NCAAF game from September 21, 2024 on ESPN.
www.espn.com www.espn.com
Click to expand...
They gifted us a chance when their QB gave us 2 pts, but I guess we felt obliged to return the gift by 1 upping with the blocked FG return for a TD. Sometimes we just can't get out of our own way.
 
This year is . . . toast. Sorry - I live in Realville (by Dr. Pepper ). We max out at 7 wins . . . most likely outcome is 6 wins - no improvement record-wise. But it was a miserable schedule, so they get a pass. This year.

But the end of next year will be three and a half years under the present regime. If we can't win 8 games next year, we need to start asking some serious questions.
 
1726988441234.png


1726988384437.png
 
USCJacket said:
So in other words, because they were close? You win and lose in the trenches, and UofL dominated along the LOS on 3rd and 4th down. And dominated against the run making GT one dimensional. After the blocked FG for a TD, there was no threat of the RPO.
Click to expand...
I don't know if you noticed but we dominated their run game to a greater degree than they did. Both teams were 1 dimensional.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top