Clemson ATL chart

It's really something when you see the lack of seniors in black and white.
 
No DJ moore that's suprising he looked good durimg that scrimage we went to
 
No William Lay or Wing Green on OL ATL
No sighting of Leo Blackburn either at WR.
 
Chimedza, Douse and Stone were not ATL for the Georgia game. Now ATL for the opener.
DEs also in one grouping for this ATL compared to the last one, which had DE and Rush End.
Judging by the ATL for the Mutts, White has put on 19 pounds and Youndjoen has added 12.
 
Well, given the young OL hopefully they will gel together and steamroll some folks in the next couple of years.

Just start out by beating people we should.
 
Blackburn, I read somewhere, broke his wrist so won’t see much of him this year.

And y’all need to remember that injured players will not appear on the ATL chart (re: a comment about certain players not on the ATL for the dwag game).

I honestly don’t quite get the objection to the ATL chart - its an obvious reference to ATLanta and the 404 and it keeps our opponents guessing. I frankly like it better than a 2-deep depth chart. We have 3 good running backs - all of whom are god enough to play. Running backs are also situational - some better on 3rd and short, some better on third and long. Why should we only list 2?
 
4-2-5, played 75% of last season in a 3-3-5

I wouldn't think it so egregious if the DL wasn't lined up 4tech-0tech-4tech in that 3-3-5. Why not brand it the 404 defense? Come on, man.
 
E5E786DB-102B-42B3-AEDE-56A0B46FA38A.gif
 
Back
Top