Coaches removed on RR.com except the...

Before he became ST coach he had always coached DB's at his previous schools.
 
DeepSnap said:
What will often happen in these cases is one coach will take the Ts & TEs, the other the Cs & Gs, or it might be split between Strong & Weak Side.... in any case, there is a lot more individual attention given to technique, footwork, and assignments.

In short, you tend to have fewer blown assignments, fewer penalties - I swear it wasn't a GT FB game without a certain departing un-named OL getting his mandatory 15 yard holding/tripping/personal foul penalty - etc.

Usually one OL coach works the booth, the other the sideline. Given Sewak & Spencer's backgrounds with CPJ, and per the USNA Press Guide, Spencer's "Known for his intensity on the field..." I'd expect Sewak in the booth & Spencer on the sidelines.

Only 8 more months til fall practice!
Click to expand...

Exactly. CPJ said he doesn't want any coach to be responsible for more than 3 starters. The only exception is Giff Smith but he will have I believe they said Mr. Burton helping him there. This per AJC. Sorry, I gotta run and can't link it.
 
Adrian Peterson was a pretty good B Back and has been in the NFL for a few years now.

Regarding our CB play, I accept that Tenuta was a fine coach for our program and his defenses generally carried the team. However, for what seems like the last many years, we always played 10 yards off the receiver at CB. Additionally, good throwing quarterbacks seemed to always give us fits. We either got to the qb immediately or got hammered. There just were not a lot of coverage sacks.

I also would like to see our DL asked to up their game just a bit. Sometimes you just have to be able to rush the passer with your front four and put some pressure on the qb. I think we ended up getting a little too focused on occupying "my lineman" so that a streaking LB/DB could make the big play. There just were very few sacks made other than the blitz.
 
DeepSnap said:
What will often happen in these cases is one coach will take the Ts & TEs, the other the Cs & Gs, or it might be split between Strong & Weak Side.... in any case, there is a lot more individual attention given to technique, footwork, and assignments.

In short, you tend to have fewer blown assignments, fewer penalties - I swear it wasn't a GT FB game without a certain departing un-named OL getting his mandatory 15 yard holding/tripping/personal foul penalty - etc.

Usually one OL coach works the booth, the other the sideline. Given Sewak & Spencer's backgrounds with CPJ, and per the USNA Press Guide, Spencer's "Known for his intensity on the field..." I'd expect Sewak in the booth & Spencer on the sidelines.

Only 8 more months til fall practice!
Click to expand...

Deepsnap, don't pick on that certain OL whose nickname was "ragdoll"
 
CPJ said he doesn't want any coach to be responsible for more than 3 starters.
Click to expand...

That is a fascinating concept, and I don't think I've ever heard it before.
 
This may work well for Paul Johnson to be OC and HC and it does work for some in major college coaching, but to be honest, I prefer head coaches hiring excellent cordinators on both sides of the ball.
 
77GTFan said:
This may work well for Paul Johnson to be OC and HC and it does work for some in major college coaching, but to be honest, I prefer head coaches hiring excellent cordinators on both sides of the ball.
Click to expand...
Considering that Sewak's title during both of Ga Southern's championship seasons under Johnson was OC, I'd say that's pretty much what has happened.
 
Wreck02 said:
Exactly. CPJ said he doesn't want any coach to be responsible for more than 3 starters. The only exception is Giff Smith but he will have I believe they said Mr. Burton helping him there. This per AJC. Sorry, I gotta run and can't link it.
Click to expand...

I read where he said that

BUT THEN WHO IS COACHING THE SAFETIES?

I mean if Kelly is the CB's coach as his title suggests; BJ LB's, Giff DL with Burnett.....then where the heck do the safeties fall? If its kelly fine....then he would need help too right?

LOL....I hope you realize I am just poking fun...PJ's concept is coaches based on #s rather than units. Kinda like having 10 physics classes of 30 than 1 of 300. More time for individual instruction.
 
33jacket said:
I read where he said that

BUT THEN WHO IS COACHING THE SAFETIES?

I mean if Kelly is the CB's coach as his title suggests; BJ LB's, Giff DL with Burnett.....then where the heck do the safeties fall? If its kelly fine....then he would need help too right?

LOL....I hope you realize I am just poking fun...PJ's concept is coaches based on #s rather than units. Kinda like having 10 physics classes of 30 than 1 of 300. More time for individual instruction.
Click to expand...

Wommack has the safeties.

The article in the AJC spells it out in nice detail this morning.
 
hiveredtech said:
I think most understand that the B-Back is the same thing as the fullback. I do think it is interesting that they changed the title from Fullback Coach as he has used at Navy to B-Back coach. I would not be surprised if the nomenclature change was simply to have the question asked "what is a b-back" so they can show the current player/recruit that this is "not your grandmothers fullback". At GT, the FB ran it about as often as a solar eclipse...in this offense they can get 15-20 carries per game. It is essentially a big tailback. Heck...they get tackled almost every play whether they have the ball or not...or sometimes sneak right down the middle of the field for a long pass!

I think it is possible both of you are correct!! ;)
Click to expand...

Actually, "your grandmother's fullback" is closer to what this fullback would be. Mayabe is isn't like "your mother's fullback". The fullback position at GT has been used as an H-back or TE in the backfield. But there was a day when fullbacks in lots of formations got the ball quite a bit. Remember Lynn Cain, William Andrews, Rocky Bleir, Franco Harris, etc.? FBs (and former FBs) used to do quite well in the NFL.

The FB in the Fridge's offense at GT got the ball quite a bit as well, considering that the same player often played both TB/RB and FB in different formations.
 
lonestarjacket said:
Actually, "your grandmother's fullback" is closer to what this fullback would be. Mayabe is isn't like "your mother's fullback". The fullback position at GT has been used as an H-back or TE in the backfield. But there was a day when fullbacks in lots of formations got the ball quite a bit. Remember Lynn Cain, William Andrews, Rocky Bleir, Franco Harris, etc.? FBs (and former FBs) used to do quite well in the NFL.

The FB in the Fridge's offense at GT got the ball quite a bit as well, considering that the same player often played both TB/RB and FB in different formations.
Click to expand...

Actually Ralph Friedgens fullbacks got the ball nowhere near the amount of carries that Paul Johnson's fullback gets it. Still more than we gave the ball to the FB the past couple of years.

My point was that the first thing the kids we are recruiting today will think when they hear "fullback" is not at all what Paul Johnson means when he says "fullback". I think we are saying the same thing...you are just considering the time since the fullback was used more (i.e. Csonka) to be closer. For you and I...yes. For a kid in high school/college Larry Csonka is a dinasour!
 
My point was that the first thing the kids we are recruiting today will think when they hear "fullback" is not at all what Paul Johnson means when he says "fullback".
Click to expand...

I agree with the crowd that believes this may be the very reason why they changed the name to 'B Back's Coach.'
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top