College Football “Execs” Want Shorter Games

Isn't spiking the ball considered an incomplete pass? Although that is generally only done towards the end of a game, that could definitely have a negative impact on games.
 
I thought the clock ran after an incomplete pass in the nfl, except for the last two minutes. I think the play clock is different as well.
 
How about fewer commercials?

:rotfl:

Naw, I know that's not a serious possibility.

Seriously, eliminating the stopped clock after a first down makes a LOT of sense. Never liked that college rule deviation from the NFL.
 
Seriously, eliminating the stopped clock after a first down makes a LOT of sense. Never liked that college rule deviation from the NFL.

Yeah that's a good one. 10 seconds per first down of stoppage x 30 first downs per game would shorten the game by 5 minutes.
 
10 minute running quarters, 5 minute halftime, 15 minutes for commercials. Games take 1 hour.

New EST TV schedule- noon - 10PM, 10 televised games, early games east coast, late games from the west coast.
 
Seems like the Execs should care that based on things many of which are mentioned in this thread, other than Tech games, the length of games for me is at zero already. Before that I was making judicious use of the 30 second skip which allowed me to watch a game in a fraction of the time, see most of the action and almost none of the commercials, halftime etc... Then they continued to make the game experience worse and eventually I stopped caring about even doing that.
 
1. Eliminate the idiotic reviews. Easy 5-10 min savings there.

2. Hire some refs that don't resemble Jabba the Hut. Probably wastes 15 secs a play waiting for the refs to waddle over to the ball, then waddle over to where they're gonna spot it. If it's it's only half that it's 20 mins.
 
Back
Top