Criticism of the coaching staff

And while I'm here, UGAgs pussy QB gets his arm bumped and the announcers are like "Oh Nooooo! Lambo boy might be hurt"

While our Texas truck driving tough as nails QB is getting body slammed and targeted and willing himself to play.

How anyone pulls for that POS cesspool is beyond me.
 
I won’t question anything specifically but generally prevent defenses simply don’t work because even with more players the WR’s can always find space when the QB has 5-6 seconds. Also, if you are going to continually run a jet sweep you have to occasionally give it to the sweep man otherwise it doesn’t cause the LB’s or Safeties to hesitate. I just hope the mental psyche of everyone stays on point because it’s all a process and Colorado will be here before we know it.
 
andrew said:
The targeting I believe they did review. They reviewed the play overall for sure, anyway. They confirmed it after the commercial break ended

As to why it wasn't called, take your pick between SEC corruption and the "no one knows what targeting really is" that we use when watching neutral games (or Efford's hit against ncsu).

For the tipped ball, with the one replay they showed on TV I didn't see it. Everyone says it was obviously tipped but no one seems to be able to provide a replay showing it.
Click to expand...
As to the ' no one really knows what targeting is' statement, if they don't know them get rid of the rule. That targeting was definitely met one of the primary criteria points that define the rule...striking an opponent with the crown of the helmet. The fact that referees and the 'replay booth' idiots apply the rules subjectively is complete and utter BS. The reviews need not take longer than 30 sec. The longer the review, the more doubt that enters into the minds of the idiots calling these things.
 
JJacket said:
Only criticisms are:

Not going for two first OT.

Not having a better play on the short OT go for two. We need an under center, fullback, and tailback jumbo set

Playing three down linemen when up 14 in the 4th, not applying pressure
Click to expand...
I agree with you 100% regarding going for 2 in the first OT. As someone else mentioned, the longer we played, the more we are effected by our lack of depth compared to them. I thought in OT we decided to play not to lose as opposed to playing to win. Again just my opinion and hindsight is an easy game to play.
 
My nit picks from Friday were going shotgun on third and 1 with Pyron and then going shotgun on fourth and 1 when Pyron didn't get anything. Thought we should have been under center.
We were screaming to run the ball in the OT 2-point session - and of course King gets stopped behind the line after we got the ball on the 1 1/2-yard line. But I also thought we were running out of gas as a team at that point too.

I thought it was a bad look when the extra point team took the field after scoring in the second OT. Rules are you gotta go for two and it showed we didn't know the rules (even though those are supposed to be explained at the start of OT and there are rules clinics held before the season).

We were so thin at DB in the latter stages that, as much as I didn't like going to prevent, I'm not sure if that wasn't by force rather than by choice. On their first TD throw in the last five minutes, IIRC, they had a guy running down the left side wide open. Nobody within 10 yards of him.

Not being able to see any kind of targeting on King's fumble from where we were, I wonder if Key even knew about it. There was a long delay and review and somebody should have brought this up to him during all this so he at least could have gone to the refs and go, hey, um, was that not targeting? Can we get a look?

For the most part, it was a helluva game plan on offense and defense for 55 minutes. We also caught a break when Kirby went for two down 17-6. If he doesn't and decides to kick, this doesn't go to OT. Even Georgia fans around us were wondering why they were going for two.
 
THWG247 said:
The ball has a tight spiral and then clearly wobbles after it hits Romello’s fingers, and besides that there wasn’t a goddamned pi to begin with, fck them refs
Click to expand...
The only person who knows for sure is Romello. He reacted immediately, telling the coaches he tipped the ball. Obviously you cannot base a call on a players word, however from his actions, you know he did.
 
BackstreetBuzz said:
The only person who knows for sure is Romello. He reacted immediately, telling the coaches he tipped the ball. Obviously you cannot base a call on a players word, however from his actions, you know he did.
Click to expand...

Truly a game of inches. Centimeters, even, in this case.
 
swampsting said:
For the most part, it was a helluva game plan on offense and defense for 55 minutes. We also caught a break when Kirby went for two down 17-6. If he doesn't and decides to kick, this doesn't go to OT. Even Georgia fans around us were wondering why they were going for two.
Click to expand...
I can play this game too. None of this matters if Birr doesn’t miss a chip shot FG.
 
GTRules said:
Yes I do. If the UGA kicker made that field goal we wouldn't have gone to overtime.
Click to expand...
If the Tech kicker made that field goal we wouldn’t have gone to overtime.

whoopi-goldberg-nana-boo-boo.gif
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top