DC Dave Wommack and CFN Writer Richard Cirminiello on RWR tomorrow

To be clear, this is on Wednesday at 6, correct?


One of these days I'm going to head down to the studio for a mobius show, and will try to get there early to see the RWR.

beej67,
founded the mobius in '98
 
Tune in tomorrow at 91.1 FM from 6pm-7pm or listen online. I will post a link to the mp3s so you can listen to it if you wish.
Cool. Thanks.

I'd really like to listen to the interview. With so much of the focus on CPJ and the O, I am very interested in hearing CDW's thoughts and observations.
 
To be clear, this is on Wednesday at 6, correct?


One of these days I'm going to head down to the studio for a mobius show, and will try to get there early to see the RWR.

beej67,
founded the mobius in '98

Yeah wednesdays 6-7pm. Dang beej, you started the mobius? You're like a legend then.
 
I'd like to see him on MEET THE MACHINE radio show where the GT fans are hungry for any news about tech.
 
I'd like to see him on MEET THE MACHINE radio show where the GT fans are hungry for any news about tech.

I doubt seriously that the AA would be in favor of any current coach or player appearing on that show. Don't think the AA isn't aware of peepad's antics over the past 3-4 years. I have to believe they won't sanction participation despite Adamm's involvement.
 
I doubt seriously that the AA would be in favor of any current coach or player appearing on that show. Don't think the AA isn't aware of peepad's antics over the past 3-4 years. I have to believe they won't sanction participation despite Adamm's involvement.

lol, Giff Smith, Jaybo Shaw, tyler davis, have all been on the show....the new head of PR for tech isn't exactly a very "nice" guy making getting players a challenge despite DRad original position on this. With that said we have other ways around it....
 
lol, Giff Smith, Jaybo Shaw, tyler davis, have all been on the show....the new head of PR for tech isn't exactly a very "nice" guy making getting players a challenge despite DRad original position on this. With that said we have other ways around it....

Something tells me if you have to have "ways around it" there's a problem. Also, maybe Dean Buchan (sp?) isn't a very nice guy to MTM because he knows about the association with peepad? Seems to me that with Radakovich's stated position on accessibility (listed as one of the black marks against Gailey), one phone call to the AD's office would fix the problem for MTM? THAT'S why I suspect that Adamm's business partner's reputation preceeds him...
 
Something tells me if you have to have "ways around it" there's a problem. Also, maybe Dean Buchan (sp?) isn't a very nice guy to MTM because he knows about the association with peepad? Seems to me that with Radakovich's stated position on accessibility (listed as one of the black marks against Gailey), one phone call to the AD's office would fix the problem for MTM? THAT'S why I suspect that Adamm's business partner's reputation preceeds him...

maybe, but no one in GTAA knows adams affiliations or if they do its certainly not rad or dean. Not to mention double b's biggest issue was gailey, a guy the gtaa fired. so you could say there was some agreement there.

also, dean is brand new....Drad promised support if we went through dean. Doing so has now been an issue....dean gave us jaybo etc, and rad has continued to support and promise help....but its not with a frequency needed for the show....so hence we have to find other ways to get guests.
 
maybe, but no one in GTAA knows adams affiliations or if they do its certainly not rad or dean. Not to mention double b's biggest issue was gailey, a guy the gtaa fired. so you could say there was some agreement there.

also, dean is brand new....Drad promised support if we went through dean. Doing so has now been an issue....dean gave us jaybo etc, and rad has continued to support and promise help....but its not with a frequency needed for the show....so hence we have to find other ways to get guests.

33 to say beebad and the GTAA agree on Chan is like saying Hitler and Andrew Young agree on Jews.
 
thanks 33Jacket for providing all the insight on the show. You guys do a great show every monday and wednesday. I think it's great that you take the time to inform us on things about Georgia Tech football & I forone love it. How can anyone that's a tech fan not enjoy it. Double B has been great on the show. How many of us didn't have a problem with Gailey?
 
Having a problem with Gailey and doing what was done by some folks in a very public manner are two quite differrent things. BB went way beyond the pale, and that he now holds a prominent position promoting Tech athletics is a very curious, even aggravating reality. You wouldn't see Wes or Kim or Bill Curry, or any public person be nearly that open about their feelings with the general public and then be placed in front of folks to represent the GTAA. I'm sure they all had their feeling about CCG, but they had the sense to keep their mouths largely shut. I wonder if Rad has read the stuff he posted and ever frequented his "site."
 
Having a problem with Gailey and doing what was done by some folks in a very public manner are two quite differrent things. BB went way beyond the pale, and that he now holds a prominent position promoting Tech athletics is a very curious, even aggravating reality. You wouldn't see Wes or Kim or Bill Curry, or any public person be nearly that open about their feelings with the general public and then be placed in front of folks to represent the GTAA. I'm sure they all had their feeling about CCG, but they had the sense to keep their mouths largely shut. I wonder if Rad has read the stuff he posted and ever frequented his "site."
From what I've been told stingtalk was started and frequented by O'Leary haters. Stingtalk was known for a long time as the "hater board", guys who were bounced from the Hive for criticizing O'Leary. Then when O'Leary left there was a lot of Gailey bashing here. Stingtalks were shunned by Hivers as hurting the program for a long time. Is this true?
 
From what I've been told stingtalk was started and frequented by O'Leary haters. Stingtalk was known for a long time as the "hater board", guys who were bounced from the Hive for criticizing O'Leary. Then when O'Leary left there was a lot of Gailey bashing here. Stingtalks were shunned by Hivers as hurting the program for a long time. Is this true?

Dang, you're opening a whole can of worms with that post.
 
As far as the Gailey bashing goes, there was only one guy that started out bashing him immediately after his hire and that was BeeWare. Over time some of his cronies came along and by the end of the first season it was a full-on movement.
 
As far as the Gailey bashing goes, there was only one guy that started out bashing him immediately after his hire and that was BeeWare. Over time some of his cronies came along and by the end of the first season it was a full-on movement.
Yeah and from what I been told Stingtalk bashed O'Leary then bashed Gailey for a couple years and was just like BBuzzOFF until the owners changed the board. Double B has changed the format of BBuzzOFF just like the owners of Stingtalk I been told changed the format here.
 
Yeah and from what I been told Stingtalk bashed O'Leary then bashed Gailey for a couple years and was just like BBuzzOFF until the owners changed the board. Double B has changed the format of BBuzzOFF just like the owners of Stingtalk I been told changed the format here.

Adamm, I seriously appreciate your passion for GT football. You have carried the same ethic into your broadcasts. That is a great "front door" for the program. Please don't take my comments/opinion as being critical of your work.

That said, I wouldn't try to define good/bad by any board, as many people come here who have no affiliation whatsoever to those who beginnings and the attitudes represented. I, for one, have no idea how StingTalk came into existence. I recently joined and have not been through a football season on this site. My take would be to make evaluation based on the individuals who are given influence by your show. Certain ones have been known by the GT blog community to have been critical to the point of destructiveness over the past years. For those individuals to now present themselves as representing GT in a positive light comes across as a bit disingenuous, and purely opportunistic.

I hope your program succeeds beyond your wildest dreams, but just know that many supporters of the program, whether friendly to the previous regime or not, are uncomfortable with that representation.
 
Adamm, I seriously appreciate your passion for GT football. You have carried the same ethic into your broadcasts. That is a great "front door" for the program. Please don't take my comments/opinion as being critical of your work.

That said, I wouldn't try to define good/bad by any board, as many people come here who have no affiliation whatsoever to those who beginnings and the attitudes represented. I, for one, have no idea how StingTalk came into existence. I recently joined and have not been through a football season on this site. My take would be to make evaluation based on the individuals who are given influence by your show. Certain ones have been known by the GT blog community to have been critical to the point of destructiveness over the past years. For those individuals to now present themselves as representing GT in a positive light comes across as a bit disingenuous, and purely opportunistic.

I hope your program succeeds beyond your wildest dreams, but just know that many supporters of the program, whether friendly to the previous regime or not, are uncomfortable with that representation.
Thanks for listening to the show.

I bet when Stingtalk changed its format like I been told a lot of people looked at it as disingenuous and opportunistic too. But thngs change and people change.
 
Back
Top