Dinich Redemption?

cajunjacket

Dodd-Like
Joined
Dec 5, 2007
Messages
11,704
I think Heather "the hated" has redeemed herself with this response to someone's question in the Chat with Heather:

Evan (Atlanta)
Heather, does the GT v UNC quiet all this blueprint talk and show that the GT offense is like any offense that can suck when the players don't do it right (ie Clemson and FSU)

Heather Dinich (12:26 PM)
YES! It's like any other offense or play calling - genius when the players execute it, and a flop when they don't.

I have been a known hater of Heather "eat spinnach" Dinich, but I think she redeems herself ... for now.
 
I saw that. I wouldn't call it redemption. She also posted about how 'bad' UNC was for losing to us. She is just always down on the ACC, but has always seemed to defend Paul Johnson and his offense, even while talking about how bad teams that lose to us are.
 
Yeah, but she is doing much better than she used to. Also, did you notice that she is still hell bent on NC State doing well. She picked them as the sleeper in the beginning of the season. Threw them under the bus after they lost to South Carolina. Now she is back on their bandwagon. She really has to make up her mind.
 
I think Heather "the hated" has redeemed herself with this response to someone's question in the Chat with Heather:



I have been a known hater of Heather "eat spinnach" Dinich, but I think she redeems herself ... for now.

Yuke would still hit it.
 
Yeah, but she is doing much better than she used to. Also, did you notice that she is still hell bent on NC State doing well. She picked them as the sleeper in the beginning of the season. Threw them under the bus after they lost to South Carolina. Now she is back on their bandwagon. She really has to make up her mind.

Yea, I actually sent her another mail entry today asking her if she was going to retract her asinine statement, or at the very least try to back it up without ESPN (SEC) bias.

I doubt she'll respond, but maybe it will piss her off more and more.
 
Yea, I actually sent her another mail entry today asking her if she was going to retract her asinine statement, or at the very least try to back it up without ESPN (SEC) bias.

I doubt she'll respond, but maybe it will piss her off more and more.

It will gradually chip away at her armor. Keep truckin'.
 
You guys are dicks.

This reminds me of a conversation with one of my fellow IT1's here in Naples:

Him: You know your drive like a total dick right?
Me: Yeah.
Him: Well, as long as you know then.

I think that the dick thing comes naturally. It is formed like a pearl, through constant irritation.
 
Yeah, but she is doing much better than she used to. Also, did you notice that she is still hell bent on NC State doing well. She picked them as the sleeper in the beginning of the season. Threw them under the bus after they lost to South Carolina. Now she is back on their bandwagon. She really has to make up her mind.

What part of the connection between her being female and her not being able to make up her mind have you not figured out yet?
 
how is dick not blurred out but rac$im is?

The board has a ****-phobia. A c1sm-phobia. There we go. You can type just about anything else imaginable, but it's deathly afraid of c1sms.
 
You know why? Because all cisms turn into ****'s. That's some scary shit right there.
 
Does anyone think Heather Dinich actually likes the ACC? She's paid to cover them. She's going to jump on and off which-ever bandwagon is currently holding the most occupants. She probably watches just enough of the games to get a "sense" of what happened, then writes a fluff piece based upon A) her limited thoughts and B) her handlers' agenda. I'm through with reading her analysis because I am an unabashed Georgia Tech fan and view the world through a beautiful pair of old gold glasses.

Her blog is useful for things like injury reports, the Tallahassee police blotter, and other factual posts. Her commentary is not on that list.
 
Does anyone think Heather Dinich actually likes the ACC? She's paid to cover them. She's going to jump on and off which-ever bandwagon is currently holding the most occupants. She probably watches just enough of the games to get a "sense" of what happened, then writes a fluff piece based upon A) her limited thoughts and B) her handlers' agenda. I'm through with reading her analysis because I am an unabashed Georgia Tech fan and view the world through a beautiful pair of old gold glasses.

Her blog is useful for things like injury reports, the Tallahassee police blotter, and other factual posts. Her commentary is not on that list.


I assume you mean her links to factual posts, because there isn't much 'fact' in what she spews.
 
Back
Top