first, to answer contact's question: i dont think TC couldve even run with ND's OL last game. it's hard to say... i'll have to see as time goes by. Travis Thomas played a terrible game, and i said from the beginning of spring camp that he shouldnt be starting -- he's losing his starting position to james aldridge as we speak.
What's that got to do with it?
everything.
He sure as hell did OK under Willingham statistically
before Weis: 54% completion percentage, 2500 yards, 17 TD, 10 INT
Weis year 1: 65%, 3920 yards, 32 TD, 7 INT
Weis year 2: 62%, 3500 yards, 37 TD, 7 INT
you'd be kidding yourself if you didnt see the dramatic change in numbers.
I don't see Jabba Weis do much with Jones: a 4 star QB.
wait... you expect miracles for a kid's first game against a top flight defense? BQ had some experience... he wasn't a clean slate. this was DJ's first ever game experience. his first game. what do you honestly expect? he's not going to light up the skies.
Let's blame Willingham for all things wrong with Notre Dame.
let's look at pure statistical facts: terrible recruiting classes, .500 teams 2 years in a row, losses to vastly inferior teams (ex: BYU)
What's going to happen this year when they look just as bad, if not worse, with Jabba's vaunted recruits and offense...
won't happen. i believe the offense will click once it gets a few games under its belt. time will tell. they are breaking in a whole new OL, new WR, new RB, and new QB... you think they are going to come out and put up gaudy numbers against one of the better defenses in the country? please.
How can you sit there and totally forget that the players that made that team half descent last year were all recruited by Willingham?
Ty had a great recruiting class his first year. wonderfull class... and i wont forget it. but, it's not hard to forget that he had two consecutive terrible seasons and then two even worse recruiting seasons. what, exactly, did Ty do with his players other than lose to inferior teams?
such an uniformed statement.
Now that those players are gone, Weis should have blue-chipper in their 3rd year of the program. If they are that much better, why aren't they making an impact.
it was their first ever collegiate game.... and this is only their second year -- not their third. the first class was a group of players that Ty recruited and charlie signed. you will see some great players in the next few years, but i will explain this to you as you seem unfamiliar with collegiate sports: a kid in his first ever collegiate game is not expected to make a gamebreaking debut -- things like this take some time.
It's an excuse to call this a rebuilding year. That's a fanbase's easiest excuse.
lol, what would you call it, then? you seem to be the knowledgable one here.... i'd like your opinion.
You have an experienced defensive line
you have just lost credibility. we have one returning starter ... trevor laws (who had an excelent game, btw). Pat Kuntz is an undersized NT playing for the first time in his career, Justin Brown starter for the first time in his career, and Dwight Stephenson Jr is a 5th year player who logged his first minutes EVER last week when Brown was ejected. Our backup NT is a TRUE FRESHMAN. Experienced defensive line? quite the opposite. Don't lie to try to prove points, it makes you look ignorant.
one starter out of 4. Maurice Crum was our only returning starter out of the LB. Vernaglia started for the first time in his career, Joe Brockington Jr was a backup last year, Toryan Smith was a first time starter, and John Ryan is a converted DE that started his first time. experience linebackers? quite the opposite. again, you are very wrong.
All of whom where gutted by Tech.
true.
Sullivan, Zbikowski, Carlson (each good players recruited by you know who).
Sullivan is a great center. he was recruited by Ty. this is correct.
Zibby? You are going to play the Zibby card after everyone on this board... and everyone else in the nation... calls him one of the most overrated players in the game? He hasn't been good since 2005.
Carlson was recruited by Ty, but Ty's offense didn't use TE's very well. Anthony Fasano is a great TE that is playing for the Cowboys now but was largely unused by Ty... his breakout year was 2005 when Weis arrived. Weis's offense is very TE friendly, and Carlson was unused under Ty.
If the talent behind these guys is so great, why aren't they out there now making a difference?
behind which guys? i dont understand the question.
I didn't see Aldridge moving too many chains.
did you watch the game? do you understand the importance of an OL in the running game? Aldridge looked good for his opportunities and broke several tackles. go back and watch the tape, he was solid even though his holes weren't there.
exactly what your points thus far have been: crap.
This is a GT board and we're talking about our QB.
who wasn't as awesome as advertised... that is my opinion. and i made it clear that i thought he will improve as he too is a new starter.
Take the excuses for the unfair firing of Willingham somewhere else.
if you dont perform at your job, you too will be fired. willingham didnt perform. do you think ND is racist for firing Willingham? The racist card baffles me... how can a university be racist when it hires a black HC in the first place? I know that's off-topic, but i'm just throwing it out there. why are my valid points labeled as excuses... because you don't agree with them? put yourself in ND's shoes... you hire a coach after Gailey that takes an up and down team, has a great year and recruiting class but then takes a nosedive and stops recruiting... how do you feel? Also, the whole "Willingham had a great first year" can be taken down the same path as those who argue against Weis: willingham won with Davie's players. Davie left the Irish with multiple NFL draft picks that are now starting across the league. Nobody ever mentions this when talking about Ty. You have to look at all facts.
If you want to continue it with me, one on one, PM.
just now read this... but i'm still posting this so others can see your outright lies and inconsistencies.
As far as Taylor goes, this WHOLE thread makes no sense. I saw a kid out there that didn't LOSE the game for us like Ball did.
Bennett did his job... he managed the game without creating fatal errors. That was the gameplan, and he executed it well. But, i read threads on here about people complaining about his name being left out of the AJC's list for award watch lists and such... fact of the matter is: as of right now, he's not nearly good enough to even be considered for any award anyway. he performed OKAY... i think you could've put in other mediocre QBs that would've been just as successful given the strong running game that GT established. Again, before i get attacked... TB showed promise, but he's not there yet. Time will tell if he is able to be great.
That's SUCH an upgrade, that I don't know why we are even having this discussion.
Reggie Ball also won some games for you guys in the past as well. I'll reserve my judgement until more competitive games come.
If a couple of drops weren't dropped, his statline wouldn be bad at all.
same could be said if he didnt overthrow some passes. heck, evan sharpley could've been great if our OL wasn't a broken dam. But, that's the game. BQ was bashed b/c of his 50% completion percentage against USC last year, but nobody failed to mention the 7, YES SEVEN, dropped balls by open WR's. Too bad... that's how the ball rolls.
So, no, he didn't have a great game. But he had a good one.
agreed.
When you can put up 33 points against ND in South Bend, you're doing something right and/or you're not doing something really wrong.
if you are talking about 2005 and 2006 version of ND, then yes, you are right... but this is a new team. analysts have said it... i tried to deny it (as did other fans), but this team is a shell of what it was the past two years. the way that ND looks right now... a win over them isn't as prestigious as it sounds.
I sure as hell am not excusing him because we got the W. That was the reason we were STUCK with Ball. But it's clear that we lost games we should not have lost because of Ball taking stupid sacks, throwing picks, etc...
agreed.
We've upgraded significantly.
i think so, but i'm still not convinced.