ContactBuzz
Probably Drinks Cosmopolitans
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2002
- Messages
- 15,219
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
<font size="2" face="Arial, Verdana, Sans-Serif">If they're (ultimately UNC & Duke, but UVA & NC St as well) holding everyone hostage in the expansion process, why would they relinquish control by changing the ACC by-laws. This whole ordeal is about control and they're blocking anything that reduces their stranglehold over the ACC.Originally posted by ahsoisee:
Why couldn't Clemson, Georgia Tech, FSU, NCSU, Maryland, and even Wake Forest wait until the revenues have been disbursed for this year, and then withdraw from the league?
Why could not the same teams call for a vote on the pay-out plan and change it? How many votes are needed for this action?
If they wait for the disbursements, grab the money and run, the remaining teams could probably merge with the Big East or form another conference in the matter of a few weeks.
Even though, Virginia, North Carolina, and Duke dropped their games with us or any of the other schools, three games will not kill a 12 game season. I believe most of the games could be filled somewhere.
Shrewd minds can overcome the minority of North Carolina, Duke, and Virginia.
![]()
<font size="2" face="Arial, Verdana, Sans-Serif">The idea of the pro-expansionists dropping out to form a new conference sounds great in theory but if the NC States, Wakes, and Marylands (teams that would bolt as a last result) were to vote on changing the ACC by-laws, they would more than likely try to make it more difficult to leave than reducing the penalties for withdrawal.Originally posted by ahsoisee:
As previously stated, the dominos would begin to fall if Tech, Clemson, FSU, and Miami were to drop out of both leagues and start a new one.
![]()