I looked back at the conversation you had (apologies for the stalking) and boy, do the posters who responded to you know nothing.
What I found hilarious was the idea that GT could just take the BoR to court if it was denied majors. Ignoring the fact that this would likely get laughed out of court, even if you assume that GT did have the legal right to expand,the idea that GT would take the BoR to court is laughable.
We would immediately see all our institutional priorities and funding completely decimated. There is no way that will ever happen. GT will never take an action to make the BoR look bad. It has to constantly maintain excellent relationships with them.
That’s the reason why the idea that you would be able to provide evidence for majors being denied maybe through meeting minutes or something is also fanciful. That’s not how it works. The way it works is that the administration has already floated what it wants to do through unofficial channels, and gauged whether it has the support or not. And then the official requests only include the items they know they have the support for.
(This, btw, was why the Clough center funding being denied was such a slap on Tech’s face because everything had been lined up and while I don’t know the details why it happened, the request for funding was rejected…something that shouldn’t really happen).
As someone who was tangentially involved, butis friends with a couple of people who were actively involved, the GT majors denial, followed by UGA’s engg school being approved was a very blatant move intended to ensure UGAg athletic dominance. Which is crazy, because as others have pointed out, it didnt really make a difference…which is only evidence of the fact that the BoR a decade ago, was willing to go to any length to prevent UGAg athletics suffering even the possibility of a negative impact.