lonestarjacket
Dodd-Like
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2006
- Messages
- 10,278
How many of our fumbles were actually "caused" by the difficulties of the TO?
I remember one game then PJ was being interviewed at halftime about fumbles and the TO (implying they are a hazard of the offense.) We had a few fumbles in the first half; some were turnovers and othere we recovered. PJ sneered and pointed out that most of our fumble porblems in that game had nothing to do with running the TO. They were on special teams or on the center to QB exchange.
I think PJ said WTTE that "there is no offense that works when you can't get the ball to your QB."
So, how much of our fumbling problem can we blame on TO difficulty last year and how much was unrelated?
Guesses are welcome unless someone kept REALLY good stats last year.
I remember one game then PJ was being interviewed at halftime about fumbles and the TO (implying they are a hazard of the offense.) We had a few fumbles in the first half; some were turnovers and othere we recovered. PJ sneered and pointed out that most of our fumble porblems in that game had nothing to do with running the TO. They were on special teams or on the center to QB exchange.
I think PJ said WTTE that "there is no offense that works when you can't get the ball to your QB."
So, how much of our fumbling problem can we blame on TO difficulty last year and how much was unrelated?
Guesses are welcome unless someone kept REALLY good stats last year.