15 minutes in Gimp during yet another boring meeting. Copy and paste + layering is your friend.
And that stadium WOULD fit into the current block the stadium is in. Notice that the field is moved southwest. You pick up room from the large area the Wardlaw building (and the immediate adjoining land) take up, as well as the room to be found behind the current west stands.
All I'm saying is that BDS would be epic (think Wrigley Field of college football) if it had a classy brick exterior ... if it was symmetric ... and if it was truly closed in. Some stadiums which I admired and thought of when I threw together my drawing:
Stanford Stadium (50,000 ... $90 million)
Yes... that's 90 mil for the ENTIRE NEW STADIUM.
Autzen Stadium (54,000 ... too old for price relevancy)
... famed for its noise. Wonder if that has anything to do with being completely bowled in.
Kenan Stadium (60,000 ... too old for price relevancy)
Scott Stadium (60,000 ... too old for price relevancy)
BDS comes closest to Kyle Field (Texas A&M) in its current monsterous endzone and lack of symmetry:
Cost of the north endzone, the south endzone, and the renovated east stands was 75 million. Raise your hand if you
don't think that was an egregious waste of money based upon what was delivered? How did BDS expansion go from the original diagram (completely bowled in, with stands huddled up to the Wardlaw building on both sides ... a completely integrated north endzone that wasn't unsightly... etc) ... to the current result??
Stanford built an ENTIRE stadium for 90 mil. Tech didn't get half of one for 2/3 of that money.
(Have I mentioned that this is my pet peeve subject yet? :P )