Good DL discussion on TOS

Diseqc said:
I read and have an account on the site in question. The low volume of traffic and the intolerance of fun keep me from posting more there.
Click to expand...
except when you want to discredit Helluva? (which I thought was funny, though not exactly damning.)

Oops, nevermind, that was cyptomcat.
 
coit said:
If you take the post at face value. It is very bad news. If we were going to be running the same defense again this year, we would definintely be looking at a big step back.

However since we are going to a new scheme it appears, most of what is written is moot. We'll know a lot more at the end of spring.
Click to expand...

Yeah I'm not overly optimistic. I think Gotsis/Kallon/Gamble/Chungong could anchor a decent line maybe in '14, but learning a new scheme with the noticeable lack of talent/depth especially at DT seems like a tall task. Hopefully Roof can make some magic happen b/c our LBs and DBs look really good next year. And I expect the offense to be moving the ball like always.
 
gtrower said:
Yeah I'm not overly optimistic. I think Gotsis/Kallon/Gamble/Chungong could anchor a decent line maybe in '14, but learning a new scheme with the noticeable lack of talent/depth especially at DT seems like a tall task. Hopefully Roof can make some magic happen b/c our LBs and DBs look really good next year. And I expect the offense to be moving the ball like always.
Click to expand...
Another thing to consider is the possibility of a vastly improved kicking game and how that boosts both O and D.

I know it's way too early to predict such, but the new kid was kicking off the ground his entire senior year in hs and still performed well. Hell, just a bunch more touchbacks should help big time.
 
Diseqc said:
TOOS. I don't post on or read the hive. That's the biggest bunch of wimps in existence on the Internet.
Click to expand...

It's really amazing how many sanctimonious pricks they have posting over there. Unbelievable, actually.
 
KillerGroove said:
It's really amazing how many sanctimonious pricks they have posting over there. Unbelievable, actually.
Click to expand...

Exactly. Hope they stay over there because we have NO sanctimonious pricks posting here. </sarcasm>
 
dressedcheeseside said:
except when you want to discredit Helluva? (which I thought was funny, though not exactly damning.)

Oops, nevermind, that was cyptomcat.
Click to expand...
I think the real funny part was others feeling the need to support helluva with one word or one sentence posts.
 
dressedcheeseside said:
That was bizarre. But the quotes you put up as evidence weren't exactly "smoking gun."
Click to expand...
IMO it's as close as you get when someone says 'I didn't predict or hype' as those were definitely predictions ('will win') and hype ('impact player').
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top