GT #17 in recruiting SO FAR...

Renfree did fine at Elite 11, most people tried to say he didn't but he impressed a lot of people. He wouldn't of been invited if he was a 3 star, Rivals sucks.
 
TechGator1066 said:
I definitely agree, which is why I ended my subscription last month. I hate how they biased they are; remember when they bumped down Calvin to 4 stars after he committed to GT?
Click to expand...

Gator you know Calvin was a mediocre 3 star player at best!!!:biggthumpup:
 
TechGator1066 said:
The QB from AZ (Renfree) was a 4 star when he committed to us, but then shortly after Rivals bumped him down to 3 stars; it was supposedly b/c he struggled at the Elite 11, but I think committing to GT had something to do with it as well, since GT hardly has any Rivals subscribers. Take a look at the Rivals GT message board: it is the most pathetic thing you will ever see.
Click to expand...

just as many moved up as down.

remember that the star systems are completely different between the two sites. For instance, Scout gives more 'high star' ratings so that more people feel good and subscribe because people like to read good things.

I never look at stars until I see people discussing it. I give my own star ratings after watching video, reading write-ups, looking at camp measurables and performance, etc. etc. My ratings are just as good...if not better...than theirs.

I subscribe for the databases and videos...I want the information. I could care less about the rankings and such...but a lot of people would rather have other people tell them what they think so they can feel better about the situation rather than make their own opinion.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top