my point is not saying anything bad about Paul Johnson or trying in any way to defend Gailey
... but..
Gailey had all the same problems when he came in and won 7 games in a tougher league (ACC has declined in last 2-3 years, IMO). we also had no QB, that is why he ended up starting a true freshman. we also had a transition to a new offense. the way Gailey handled it led to a limited playbook, but 7 wins.
why should we not expect the same of a guy that is making more $$ than the guy we fired that did it?
also, if you actually look at the numbers this would have been the first year that Gailey's record was not better to or equal to the year before. so we were actually improving in the results area.
i still dont hear a reason why we should not expect 7 wins from this guy