LagrangeJacket
Dodd-Like
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2008
- Messages
- 11,956
The under was never in doubt.It was the right call.
Sincerely,
MINN +3.5 & the under
Iowa had 2 yards of offense in the second half.
The under was never in doubt.It was the right call.
Sincerely,
MINN +3.5 & the under
Assuming the ref believed there was an invalid fair catch, how is he supposed to make that known? Blow the whistle? But he can’t throw a flag?There’s a lot wrong with this post, but I’ll just point out one. There shouldn’t be a flag thrown for an invalid fair catch signal. It’s not a foul, and there’s no penalty.
Assuming the ref believed there was an invalid fair catch, how is he supposed to make that known? Blow the whistle? But he can’t throw a flag?
probably not his intent, but thats a fair catch signalJust so we're all on the same page, here is what was called as an invalid fair catch signal:
probably not his intent, but thats a fair catch signal
#4 went out of bounds then came back in to make a block, some rule about "establishing yourself" or something not sure he did that.Arguably a block to the back at the 28
probably not his intent, but thats a fair catch signal
if he had caught that and gotten blown up, its 15 yardsisn't it supposed to be OVER your head?
So you're saying it's an invalid fair catch signal?isn't it supposed to be OVER your head?
How can it be invalid? He never raised his hand, and then never acted like he expected the play to be blown dead. No on reacted as if it were a fair catch. It makes no sense to go backwards and change the ruling thereSo you're saying it's an invalid fair catch signal?
That is a fair catch signal. It sucks but iiwii. First wave arm is straight, then last two it gets bent upwards, higher each time. Doubtful it was his intent, but I can understand the call.Just so we're all on the same page, here is what was called as an invalid fair catch signal:
So you're saying it's an invalid fair catch signal?
How can it be invalid? He never raised his hand, and then never acted like he expected the play to be blown dead. No on reacted as if it were a fair catch. It makes no sense to go backwards and change the ruling there
I am saying its NOT a fair catch signal. It either is or it isnt. binary. what is all this invalid öööö. are holds invalid blocks or are they holds?? nobody calls for a fair catch while directing blockers..
The rules literally say that "any waving motion" that doesn't meet the criteria of a valid fair catch signal is an invalid fair catch signal. If he's waving his arm, it's an invalid signal. And the ball should be dead when he possesses it.
See for yourself on p. 35 of the NCAA rulebook.
I see returners wave their hands all the time to tell their teammates to stay away from the ball on a roll. are those invalid fair catch signals also??... this is all bullshit. I don't like Iowa or the Big 10 and this is still bullshit.