FatJacket
Helluva Engineer
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2008
- Messages
- 2,219
yep. Both 2014 & 2015 were outliers. The norm is more like the mediocrity of 2012 and 2013.
So about 500 ball. That's the norm? We get PJ and Sewak and 500 ball?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
yep. Both 2014 & 2015 were outliers. The norm is more like the mediocrity of 2012 and 2013.
That's been the norm for like fifteen years, hasn't it?So about 500 ball. That's the norm? We get PJ and Sewak and 500 ball?
That's been the norm for like fifteen years, hasn't it?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G850A using Tapatalk
yep. Both 2014 & 2015 were outliers. The norm is more like the mediocrity of 2012 and 2013.
When are who we thought we were. A .500 team, slightly better, who has to have senior/experience laden teams to win big. That means we'll be very good (10 wins) everY 4 or 5 years, likely pretty bad the year after we are very good, and mediocre the other 3 years.
We do not, and never have so probably will not start now, recruit enough depth to reload year after year. It's pretty simple.
But I will take a coach who can/will win the conference, beat UGA, and win a big bowl every 4 or 5 years, then have a bad year like this year, over 7-6 and a toilet bowl every year.
Regular Season wins under CPJ (acc wins)
9 (5)
9 (7)
6 (4)
8 (5)
6 (5)
7 (5)
10 (6)
3 (1)
We are a 7-8 win team generally. Personally, if we have to average 7 wins, I'll take the 14-15 seasons over the 11-12 seasons.
Somehow Chan could keep us from a 3 win season.
Somehow Chan could keep us from a 3 win season.
yeah but like CPJ, Chan couldn't develop a QB.
I'm glad Chan's gone but it'd be nice to have a coach that could beat the mutts, VPI, and Miami more than 25% of the time. I don't get why the 25% winning percentage vs those teams is so worshiped around here.
I don't get why the 25% winning percentage vs those teams is so worshiped around here.
Chan had Reggie, who regressed each year. Bennet who regressed each year. And Suggs who was consistently bad.
CPJ had JfN who improved, although the offense regressed after lossing two draft picks. Washington who improved running the O each year. Vad, who regressed although it was hard to tell since he went from mop up duty to started. And Thomas who appears to have regressed after losing two draft picks.
CPJ has shown he can develop qbs. He hasn't shown that he can develop an O line as a unit (several individual linemen have shown marked improvement).
exactly
these same types that dont think that we should crush Georgie, Miami, VT, FSU, ND, etc nearly every year are the ones that worship $80k. is $220k too much too ask?
just because no coach ever in the history of Georgia Tech football has ever been able to consistently beat all the best teams in our region doesnt mean that we shouldnt be doing it!
a bunch of losers. poor losers
Chan had Reggie, who regressed each year. Bennet who regressed each year. And Suggs who was consistently bad.
CPJ had JfN who improved, although the offense regressed after lossing two draft picks. Washington who improved running the O each year. Vad, who regressed although it was hard to tell since he went from mop up duty to started. And Thomas who appears to have regressed after losing two draft picks.
CPJ has shown he can develop qbs. He hasn't shown that he can develop an O line as a unit (several individual linemen have shown marked improvement).
Yep- Gailey was a terrible QB coach. Already pointed that out. Ball was much, much worse as a 4-yr SR than as a frosh.
JFN was pretty much the same QB most of his CPJ career and never improved his passing. Tevin didn't get much better (certainly not as a passer). Vad looked good in spots but then dismal in others before he quit.
JT definitely regressed though it's understandable given how badly the OL regressed. 2016 will be telling for him.
I apologize. The OL did not suck dick most games. Sucking dick implies they made contact with the opposing defense. My analysis was clearly wrong.
I would agree that contact is required.