I do not believe there is any correlation between offensive and defensive performance, as you are suggesting. I see no pattern there.
West Virginia? Louisville?
I don't think it's necessarily a correlation about performance, but rather style. One of the big shots against Bennett early this year was that he was rushing his throws, not taking enough time in the pocket, right? That could
clearly be due to practicing against our
style of defense, a style that's all about rushing the throw and confusing the coverage. Right?
Think about learning to ride a bike. If you and I both start learning to ride a bike at the same time, and I learn in a parkinglot and you learn on Mount Ranier, who's going to learn to ride a bike faster?
Do recall, the current incarnation of Tech D is an evolution of Tenuta D that we really didn't see until maybe his last year at UNC. UNC did JT's zone dog stuff, but wasn't blitzing 2 every down like we are. Ohio State blitzed less than UNC did. The current Tech D is a result not only of JT's previous work, but of our current players, and of the climate in the ACC in the late 90s and early 2000s that made 4-3 base defenses like the Roof/O'Leary D fail.
Just opinions, but I've been to practices before, and I can't imagine "learning" to throw the ball vs our D. I would want to "learn" vs a 4-3 base, over and over.