lonestarjacket
Dodd-Like
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2006
- Messages
- 10,278
OK, that subject has been beaten to death. And the counters to that theory have also been beaten to death. But seeing it come up again with EVERY opponent and mentioned again from many analysts. Taking off my gold-colored glasses, I am still left with a burning question for those proposing our "exposure".
Why doesn't anyone say, "Georgia Tech was exposed by Gardner-Webb?"
For those on this board, it is a bit of a rhetorical question. But why do people insist on pointing to that one game when we played poorly and were "stopped" in games before and after LSU?
If we were truly "exposed" by LSU, then we should have run roughshod over everyone before that game and we should have been stopped easily by everyone after that game.
Why doesn't anyone say, "Georgia Tech was exposed by Gardner-Webb?"
For those on this board, it is a bit of a rhetorical question. But why do people insist on pointing to that one game when we played poorly and were "stopped" in games before and after LSU?
If we were truly "exposed" by LSU, then we should have run roughshod over everyone before that game and we should have been stopped easily by everyone after that game.