Maybe TStan is playing 4D chess

I’m still astonished every week after every loss people still hold onto the hope that recruiting has actually improved despite the evidence smacking them in the nose.

I've asked the same question myself. Holding the current recruiting class together would be impressive. We currently have five 4 star commits. I’m not certain we’ve ever had that many, certainly PJ didn’t.
 
The only way he’s playing 4D chess is if he’s playing regular chess while jerking off two boosters.
 
256653493_1288931394866923_9005012889636633494_n.jpeg

That was the fewest number of fans I’ve seen (or not seen would be more accurate) in 222 since I’ve had seats in that section.
 
Option coach fired. Cupboard is bare.

Hire ööööhead A-caliber recruiter that isn’t good game day coach.

Keep ööööhead there 3-4 years to restock cupboard.

Fire ööööhead.

Bring in Coach O or some damn body to work with talent and continue the build.

This is all I got.
The way you do this is what Radakovitch did with Hewitt.

He got money for a new arena which meant a renovation in a couple of years so we wouldn’t even be playing in our own court. He fired Hewitt. And he hired Gregory, a so so coach, who was unlikely to improve us much (if he did that’s a massive bonus!) but almost certainly wouldn’t hurt the team. In the meanwhile, he’d run a clean quiet program with little to no drama. And most importantly, he’d agree to a cheap, short, contract which could easily be terminated close to the end of Hewitt’s payout at which point we could go in for the bigger splashy hire with money we had in the bank.

It was a great plan, screwed up by his successor who gave him an extension.

Hiring a loud, expensive coach on a reasonably long contract is not how you do this. If that’s what he was trying, he played it like he was playing X’s and O’s
 
I’m still astonished every week after every loss people still hold onto the hope that recruiting has actually improved despite the evidence smacking them in the nose.

I believe recruiting has improved. I also think the coaching is so bad that it hardly matters in 90% of our games.

But yes, I absolutely believe we have more talent for a new coach to work with than we did three years ago.
 
I believe recruiting has improved. I also think the coaching is so bad that it hardly matters in 90% of our games.

But yes, I absolutely believe we have more talent for a new coach to work with than we did three years ago.
Why?
 

Because we had virtually no playmakers then. Lots of undersized guys who were good fits for the option, but not much else. They were well-coached but not particularly talented. Now we have the opposite problem.
 
Because we had virtually no playmakers then. Lots of undersized guys who were good fits for the option, but not much else. They were well-coached but not particularly talented. Now we have the opposite problem.
Which players were undersized and not talented? Mason? Oliver? Graham? Dontae? Sanders? Carter? Our 6-3’+ Now senior linemen?
 
Last edited:
Which players were undersized and not talented? Mason? Yates? Oliver? Graham? Dontae? Sanders? Carter? Our 6-3’+ senior linemen?

You just listed one guy that would maybe start for one of our ACC competitors.
 
Which players were undersized and not talented? Mason? Oliver? Graham? Dontae? Sanders? Carter? Our 6-3’+ Now senior linemen?

Majority of the a-backs and o-linemen. You obviously feel that the talent level then was superior or equal to what it is now, and that's fine. I'm not going to jump through hoops to convince you otherwise.
 
You just listed one guy that would maybe start for one of our ACC competitors.
That’s weird because they just got finished with a season beating almost all of our ACC competition.
 
Back
Top