andrew
Bobby Bonilla's Financial Planner
- Joined
- Jun 5, 2010
- Messages
- 27,832
It might have helped if the AA's actually had functioned under the general budget of the universities and had to pay coaches in accordance with university personnel policy. There would have been recourse for keeping coaches' salaries at a reasonable level.
I've long thought something similar but the more I think about it the more I'm convinced it isn't possible.
Let's say the AA does function under the general budget of the universities. Is there really a policy that stops Alabama from saying, "The AA is bringing us in $200 million yearly in revenue, and hiring Nick Saban will increase that by $50 million. Hiring him for $10 million/year will actually help the university budget!"
There would probably be some more guardrails and it might have taken longer, but ultimately we would have ended in a similar place because these super high coach and administrator salaries really do make fiscal sense. People love college football and popularity means money.
The notion of a super popular sport that eschews money and stays true to its amateur roots is simply incompatible with capitalism -- and human nature, really. With millions of people packing stadiums every Saturday and tens of millions more watching at home, everyone involved is going to want a piece of what their work is generating and the only way to stop it would be some sort of law that goes directly against what our current economic system is set up to encourage.