Nov 2 Othergames Thread

Pittsburgh now needs to recreate that miracle drive 3 more times in one quarter and allow no more first downs.
 
Except they won’t be. More than likely it will be Miami (which is still hard to believe). But it is quite comical that SMU paying their own way is owning the ACC.
what if i told you.. take a minute.. hold my beer....that there could be more than one ACC team in the playoff? would that pop your USC cherry?@?
 
Clemson down 3 TD with less than 5 min to play - the very definition of garbage time - playing hurry-up for style points.

Geez, hope nobody gets hurt.
 
what if i told you.. take a minute.. hold my beer....that there could be more than one ACC team in the playoff? would that pop your USC cherry?@?
But there won’t be more than 1 now. That’s the point you seem to be missing. Clemson was the ACC’s only hope as a “brand” getting in against a team like Indiana, SMU, Pitt, etc. The Miami/SMU ACC Championship game winner is the lone ACC CFP team.

ND is the winner tonight.
 
But there won’t be more than 1 now. That’s the point you seem to be missing. Clemson was the ACC’s only hope as a “brand” getting in against a team like Indiana, SMU, Pitt, etc.

ND is the winner tonight.
So if Miami has an only loss in a championship game to a 1 loss SMU, you think Miami doesn't get in? I'm not necessarily disagreeing, just asking if you're including that scenario.
 
But there won’t be more than 1 now. That’s the point you seem to be missing. Clemson was the ACC’s only hope as a “brand” getting in against a team like Indiana, SMU, Pitt, etc. The Miami/SMU ACC Championship game winner is the lone ACC CFP team.

ND is the winner tonight.
you have less faith in the ACC than the actual people who vote for this stuff... your an SEC blowhard arent you?
 
what if i told you.. take a minute.. hold my beer....that there could be more than one ACC team in the playoff? would that pop your USC cherry?@?
Not anymore. Clemson shouldn’t have lost.
 
Back
Top