Ok, Let's Count [The Poll]

[mm42]

I wish the choices in the poll could have been less prejudicial. You know, something like:

• I am a piece of human excrement with no values or judgment and therefore I want to keep Coach Gailey forever, even after he's dead
• We suck so bad as a school and a program we can't do any better than this loser
• Being a non-idiot who does not eat dog poo, I naturally want to fire our retarded head coach

 

[rambleON]

Aren't the "keep the staff, fire Chan" and "send 'em all packing except maybe Tenuta & Giff" pretty similar? I mean Bond hasn't had the chance to show us much, and is probably hand cuffed by CHANball.

I think JT and Giff would be a priority but the other coaches could either stay or go depending on who comes in.

 

[beej67]

... Chan Gailey equilibrium to borrow a phrase, if you will. Seven wins a season is the maximum amount of wins we can expect from a team coached by Gailey. ...

I'm not a Chan Basher, and still hold out hope that we can turn a corner this year, but technically you can rephrase the Chan Gailey Equilibrium into 5 losses instead of 7 wins and we still met it last year.


mm42, I agree about the phrasing, but it's nevertheless a crapton better than "Anyone who responds to this thread counts as a poll vote for wanting Chan fired." Talk about loaded threads..

 

[GTKyle]

Those 9 votes have to be a joke.