GTg8r
Varsity Lurker
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2002
- Messages
- 465
Saw this below...
The Y ran 3-3-5 scheme last night.
I believe we had the std. 6 man front.
That should have given us several 2 on 1 against their d-line. Shouldn't they have been able to slip a LB in on a delayed blitz/pressure because our guys were choosing to double team their initial rush?
I can't remember if they blitzed the LB's in the 2nd half.
So where was the negation of OL surge?
Any answers out there
The Y ran 3-3-5 scheme last night.
I believe we had the std. 6 man front.
That should have given us several 2 on 1 against their d-line. Shouldn't they have been able to slip a LB in on a delayed blitz/pressure because our guys were choosing to double team their initial rush?
I can't remember if they blitzed the LB's in the 2nd half.
So where was the negation of OL surge?
Any answers out there