Pat Forde on football and engineering

Yellow Pantaloons

Banhammer'd
Ban Hammer'd
Joined
Feb 24, 2016
Messages
152
https://sports.yahoo.com/josh-rosen-right-college-football-school-dont-mix-174001650.html

... Georgia Tech is a world-famous engineering school, a reputation that certainly attracts a segment of studious athletes. But according to the 2017 Georgia Tech football media guide, zero seniors (in terms of football eligibility) are engineering majors. Maybe this year is an anomaly, but it stands out.

Of the 108 players with listed majors in the guide – 78 veterans and 30 incoming freshmen – 75 are business administration majors or intend to major in business administration.

Let it be said: a business administration degree from Georgia Tech is undoubtedly a valuable thing. The point is not to knock the business school. But it’s not the university’s primary claim to fame.

Forty-three percent of Tech’s incoming freshmen football players say they want to major in a science: mechanical engineering, biomedical engineering, biology, biochemistry, robotics engineering, pre-med or applied physics. The percentage of players on the roster who have been there at least one year and are majoring in engineering or another science drops to 29.

Less than half of those 29 percent (a total of nine players) are entering their third or fourth year at Tech. And of that nine, most have played sparingly or not at all.


The rare exceptions who major in engineering at Georgia Tech and play a lot: junior starting linebacker Brant Mitchell (mechanical engineering), junior starting wide receiver Brad Stewart (mechanical engineering), junior pass-rush specialist Anree Saint-Amour (industrial engineering).

Those guys are trying to make school and football go together at the highest level. Josh Rosen and a lot of other student-athletes know how hard that is, in a system not designed for both to coexist.
 
Call me biased, but I disagree with Pat's premise here. What makes Ma Tech great is that we are a great engineering school, yes, but even more, we are great at everything we do. That, among other things, is what makes me damn proud to be a Tech alum.

That said, Pat's point overall remains. Engineering at Tech is not for the faint of heart, and it takes a special person to be able to do engineering and D1 sports at Tech.
 
would be nice to compare the % of non-athlete students who change from a science degree to a non-science degree at GT.

but I agree the point stands. there aren't many, though it is certainly not impossible.
 
It's just inherently difficult to train to be among the best at something highly competitive *and* do something else unrelated that others do full time. I don't think it's a problem particular to football and college.
 
According to my mailbox this morning, the average ACT score of this year's incoming freshman class is 31. I wonder what the average ACT score of the 43 percent of incoming freshman football players who want to major in a science is? That could have something to do with why so few stick it out. Personally, my hat is off to anyone who dedicates the time necessary to pursue an engineering degree and still finds the time to practice and train for football at this level.
 
Nobody goes to school wanting to be an I.E.

Not a criticism, just an observation. Point being, things change when you get into college. There are biology majors and such at GT also
 
Athletic people are usually born with some type of natural talent. Likewise, above average smart people are also born with a natural talent. Whatever the gift, people usually spend more time doing whatever it is they enjoy and do best. An athlete who can run fast typically won't spend their free time doing math related activities. And math geniuses don't usually do sprints at the track when they are bored. People who can do both and excel in both are very rare in my opinion.
 
Nobody goes to school wanting to be an I.E.

Not a criticism, just an observation. Point being, things change when you get into college. There are biology majors and such at GT also

Agree, but only to the extent that ISyE isn't "common knowledge" as much to a 17-year-old (or their parents) and it's not a "traditional" engineering field like ME, EE, CE, and even ChemE are.
 
Is the number of football players at uga who become veterinarians higher or lower than the number who teach themselves how to read Dr. Seuss?
But it was clearly stated that UGAg's goal was:
If we can just teach him to read and write, maybe he can work at the post office rather than as a garbage man when he leaves,' Almand said.
 
Re Rosen: Nothing pisses me off more than a football player who is going to school for free, has priority classes, free tutoring, and staff assigned to them passing bitch about having to work hard. SAs outside of football do this all the ööööing time without crying about it. No, you don't get to party every night, and yes it's supposed to be hard. Man the öööö up and shut your damn mouth.
 
Nobody goes to school wanting to be an I.E.

Not a criticism, just an observation. Point being, things change when you get into college. There are biology majors and such at GT also

What a completely dumbass statement.
 
What percent of uGA athletes have a major higher ranked higher than GT BSBA?

Answer: 0. uGA has 0 majors ranked higher than a GT business degree.
Untrue. Their leftist cesspool of a journalism major is highly ranked.
 
Back
Top