Supreme Court NCAA decision

Of course there has always been benefits to players that are under the radar. But the point you make is like the use of marijuana. It’s always been around despite its illegality. But it’s used a lot more now in states where it’s legal, than when it was illegal. You guys can go ahead and give me the “Big Cry” but the reality of that SC decision is very good for The University of Georgia and very bad for Georgia Tech. That Supreme Court decision is not going to be “so funny” to GT fans in 5-10 years.The Georgia Tech athletic department barely breaks even now. We are in no position to get into bidding wars with The football Factories.
But are the potheads that were smoking before legalization responsible for the rise in usage?
 
I don’t care who it helps or not. What I like is that it’s a big step into the death of the current system. If as you say only the factories will benefit then fine. There are a lot more of the haves than have nots. Eventually the have nots will get together and force something to happen. I just don’t think all this will shake out like many think. Right now the factories win the under the table game. Once you remove the under the table part you’ll see a lot of over the table money appear. Think T. Boone Pickens buying every player legally. I think you’ll see an emergence of an entire different level of factories when the illegal becomes legal.
 
Last edited:
1624375475806.png
Just download the revamped mod it's really fun I've been playing it for a week now
 
So its official finally. Colleges sponsor professional football teams.


I have been saying forever they are "athlete-students". An athlete-student almost never transfers when they are doing well academically but they want to find a better or more suited to them academic program. It is always the coach or playing time or the system or whatever sports related. That is not an academics first person.
 
If college athletes can now make money, should they still receive free tuition, room, boarding, medical, training, food, transportation etc.? My thought would be no, but only apply to those who are raking it in which would be a small percentage.
 
Back
Top