The Tech Way NIL

Should I take money planned for AT Fund giving and give to Tech Way? some argument that Tech Way will go to football and basketball as opposed to lesser sports.
You can direct your donation to any sport for either AT Fund or TechWay. If you want it to go to 100% football, you can ear mark that when you make the donation. There's an option for it.
 
If you are a poster on this board i have to assume you are a fan of GT. We must monetize our fandom. This is the way. If you aren't making a monthly contribution which is easily set up for even the smallest amount you can afford then don't cry and complain. It doesn't matter if you can afford $5 or $5000, just give it. Everyone has to care.
 
We get left behind even if we play because all other schools are doing the same thing and many have larger fanbases. At best we pay enough to afford lesser talent than before NIL. Only hope I see in this new pro era is mega donors.
So…….nothing has changed.
 
I agree that we have to financially support this, but only because the idiots running this show have made it the norm for schools to use these collectives. But, this is a colossal screwup of NIL across the board by the NCAA that ultimately will end up strengthening the status quo, which is what the NCAA always does these days. This is what Saban, Coach K and the UNC AD have lobbied for since NIL came into being - that collectives that are carefully managed be used to compensate the athletes “fairly”. Do you reckon this is because they think this is what is best for their schools continuing their advantage?

The biggest, most successful schools with the strongest financial bases will raise the most money for these collectives. The NCAA said that NIL could not be offered as a recruiting incentive. But, of course that is exactly what is happening. The NCAA should have stood fast on saying that no coach or athletic department representative could offer any athlete any promise of pay for play. Any proof of the school offering pay incentives should have landed the school and coaches involved on serious probation. Any proof of an athlete negotiating pay for play directly with a coach or school should have led to their immediate and long term ineligibility.

Of course, that means alums and boosters would have had free reign to pay athletes whatever they are willing to pay. That would and did lead to some crazy deals. But, ultimately, the market would settle down except for exceptional players and just plain crazy fans and alums. With all Atlanta and Tech alums and companies with strong ties to Tech alums have to offer, I think Tech would have ultimately done well with individuals negotiating NIL deals of internships, advertising, social media influencing, etc.; better than a collective doling out money. And, our donations in the past paid for scholarships and operations. If we give to the Tech Way, how will we fund operations and scholarships for the full sports program?

I feel like we are using the playbook to respond to the new day brought about by NIL written by the power schools and athletic bureaucrats who fear losing their advantage and control. I would have preferred keeping them out of NIL as much as possible. Just my thought.
 
The NCAA should have stood fast on saying that no coach or athletic department representative could offer any athlete any promise of pay for play. Any proof of the school offering pay incentives should have landed the school and coaches involved on serious probation. Any proof of an athlete negotiating pay for play directly with a coach or school should have led to their immediate and long term ineligibility.

The reason we are in this situation now is that the NCAA refused to see the writing on the wall and kept a blanket ban on players earning money way longer than was tenable, which led to a lawsuit going all the way up the the Supreme Court and a ruling which tied their hands. I suspect what we're seeing now is the NCAA learning from its mistake.

The next frontier is schools paying players directly. If the NCAA stands firm on coach/school NIL involvement and hands out harsh penalties to players for it, then we would have had a good five or so years of "real" NIL -- while the next lawsuit worked its way through the system and the SC completely opened the door to unregulated pay for play.

By backing down on that and allowing coaches/schools to be involved, everyone involved may be happy enough that no lawsuit gets enough momentum behind it to go all the way to the SC.
 
By backing down on that and allowing coaches/schools to be involved, everyone involved may be happy enough that no lawsuit gets enough momentum behind it to go all the way to the SC.
Wait. Is this serious?

There is no way that all lawyers will ever be satisfied as long as a potential large lawsuit is involved. The love of money... it will never stop. Amateur sports at the college level is gone forever. There is one chance for it to survive and that is if there is the formation of the so-called super league where "college players" are paid. It perhaps could be argued that there is the place for that level player to go to be paid, leaving the rest of college football to remunerate players in-kind, using the college education as tender. IMPO, it is the only hope for such an outcome.
 
Mack Brown has it right.
(i know it‘s not Tech but I didn’t want to start another thread for it)


Agreed he has it right. The current model is totally unsustainable and the cat's not getting put back in the bag, so it's time to embrace it.

Although I always chuckle when a coach who has been making millions a year for decades says he thought college football was about amateurism up until now.

He hates that college football is turning into the NFL but sure went after that NFL-level paycheck back when he was at Texas. That's a pretty good gig -- getting to feel good about coaching an amateur sport while getting paid like it's a professional sport.
 
Back
Top