GTplusCPJequalsSuccess
Flats Noob
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2008
- Messages
- 653
Has once again picked against GT this week. Good news for us, he picked FSU to beat us too.
Now that we know Nesbitt is A-OK and with a little confidence in Claytor, seeings how both of those new guys did fine against FSU other than one botched play, how do you think we will fare?
I think it will be close no doubt. This game has been pretty scary since I realized UNC ain't no joke this year. That said, their secondary and INT's ain't no joke, but the rest of the team is good, Nicks is pretty good but I would say Carr is a bit better. The only problem for UNC is that their impressive wins come when there are a lot of INT's in the game, and obviously they cannot count on that from GT. Their wins come like this:
BC: 3 INT's
UCONN: 3 INT's
MIA: 2 INT's
Not sure how many are pick 6's from that. If you take away those INT's their wins are not so impressive. I think that is the differece in this game. Also, obviously the offense from GT is def. going to be a big difference.
I'll say:
GT: 21
UNC: 17
Now that we know Nesbitt is A-OK and with a little confidence in Claytor, seeings how both of those new guys did fine against FSU other than one botched play, how do you think we will fare?
I think it will be close no doubt. This game has been pretty scary since I realized UNC ain't no joke this year. That said, their secondary and INT's ain't no joke, but the rest of the team is good, Nicks is pretty good but I would say Carr is a bit better. The only problem for UNC is that their impressive wins come when there are a lot of INT's in the game, and obviously they cannot count on that from GT. Their wins come like this:
BC: 3 INT's
UCONN: 3 INT's
MIA: 2 INT's
Not sure how many are pick 6's from that. If you take away those INT's their wins are not so impressive. I think that is the differece in this game. Also, obviously the offense from GT is def. going to be a big difference.
I'll say:
GT: 21
UNC: 17