If Mizzou can win the east, what does it say about the SEC? You have two new teams joining your conference. One of the teams beats your best team in their first year. The other one wins the big bad SEC east in their second year. SEC = overrated??
Not to mention, A&M and Mizzou were perceived as being pretty mediocre prior to joining the SEC. Now they look better after playing an SEC schedule. Isn't it supposed to be the opposite. I thought the SEC schedule made teams get beat up and look worse.