Utah conference proposes 8-team-playoff

Now I know why the BCS is so completely ****ed up. John Swofford, the most incompetent fool to ever lead a major conference, is head of the BCS. When will the ACC get rid of this tool?
 
BarrelORum said:
Now I know why the BCS is so completely ****ed up. John Swofford, the most incompetent fool to ever lead a major conference, is head of the BCS. When will the ACC get rid of this tool?
Click to expand...

I believe the commissioner of the BCS rotates among the BCS conferences every two years. Swofford's term should be just about up.
 
gth816f said:
I believe the commissioner of the BCS rotates among the BCS conferences every two years. Swofford's term should be just about up.
Click to expand...

When will he no longer be ACC commissioner? I know chinese whores who can do a better job than he can. And I say that with a straight face. Swofford is incompetent.
 
I've really enjoyed myself for the last few months. You know why? Because I haven't heard or thought about Swofford. UGH.
 
BarrelORum said:
When will he no longer be ACC commissioner? I know chinese whores who can do a better job than he can. And I say that with a straight face. Swofford is incompetent.
Click to expand...

Actually a good question, I have no idea how the ACC commissioner is chosen. I would guess it's by a board consisting of university presidents.
 
gth816f said:
Actually a good question, I have no idea how the ACC commissioner is chosen. I would guess it's by a board consisting of university presidents.
Click to expand...

Well, we already know one of those presidents is no longer in place. Clough couldn't make a decent hire if his job depended on it.
 
12105287736rf3fr.jpg
 
gth816f said:
Actually a good question, I have no idea how the ACC commissioner is chosen. I would guess it's by a board consisting of university presidents.
Click to expand...

I think the ADs at UNC and Duke choose the comissioner.:eek5:
 
BarrelORum said:
Well, we already know one of those presidents is no longer in place. Clough couldn't make a decent hire if his job depended on it.
Click to expand...

Clough did choose DRad over Curry, which I am very, very thankful for. Not really sure if that atones for Braine though.

The NCAA as well as the conferences really do very few things, do none of them well, and the commissioners get paid hundreds of thousands in the process. It's the good 'ol boys system at its worse.
 
BarrelORum said:
Well, we already know one of those presidents is no longer in place. Clough couldn't make a decent hire if his job depended on it.
Click to expand...

Radakovich? Chameau? and I can think of many others that were good hires. Of course, you can counter with Braine and Gailey. PJ was hired on Clough's watch.

Even so, Tech is going to miss Clough a lot.

p.s. Swofford is a little girl. WE could probably replace him with one of your aforementioned Chinese whores and no one would notice. After all, I'm sure they'd provide Duke and UNC the same services Swofford has been putting out.
 
TechSBP said:
p.s. Swofford is a little girl. WE could probably replace him with one of your aforementioned Chinese whores and no one would notice.
Click to expand...
Not so. With the Chinese whore, at least we know we'd get our moneys worth. Swofford just ****s us and doesn't even bother giving us a reacharound.
 
To hell with a playoff.

The BCS is here to stay.

If you think otherwise, you are delusional and misinformed.

For those wanting a playoff, face the reality - those who make decisions in D-1A College Football are not Barry Obama.
 
cyptomcat said:
Mountain West proposes 8 team playoff:
http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=3952542

BCS bowl become quarter finals and semi-finals in the proposed format. A 'selection committee' chooses and seeds teams.

Just something interesting to note, of course it's not happening.
Click to expand...

If 'and if' that actually happened... Utah, BYU, Mountain West Conference, or whoever goes undefeated from a non-BCS conference would be left out of an eight team playoff and they would continue to bitch and complain....this solves nothing....A 11-1/10-2/9-3 ACC SEC B12 B10 PAC10 team is more deserving of one of those 8 spots than an undefeated Big Mountain **** conference team or whatever...
 
yellowandnaked said:
If 'and if' that actually happened... Utah, BYU, Mountain West Conference, or whoever goes undefeated from a non-BCS conference would be left out of an eight team playoff and they would continue to bitch and complain....this solves nothing....A 11-1/10-2/9-3 ACC SEC B12 B10 PAC10 team is more deserving of one of those 8 spots than an undefeated Big Mountain **** conference team or whatever...
Click to expand...
Yea, except that Utah beat a 12-1 team from the "mighty" SEC this year. Make no mistake, if there's an 8 team playoff, there will be one charity team in every season from a mid major conference. That's the only way the system can feign impartiality, while maintaining the current status quo. The problem is that some of the mid major **** teams are actually quite good.
 
Last edited:
Damarius said:
To hell with a playoff.

The BCS is here to stay.

If you think otherwise, you are delusional and misinformed.

For those wanting a playoff, face the reality - those who make decisions in D-1A College Football are not Barry Obama.
Click to expand...

you are like 12 and have no concept of the history of college football. you dont know what you are talking about. the BCS already almost went down.. just a few years ago

the formula for one of your posts:

controversial commment

unjustifyably bold statement of psuedo fact

statement that if reader does not (insert verb) with your comment that they can (insert pejorative term or insult here)

re-iterate the ridiculous comment arleady made with even greater mock authority

[then come back and post in response to yourself again within 3 minutes]
 
yellowandnaked said:
A 11-1/10-2/9-3 ACC SEC B12 B10 PAC10 team is more deserving of one of those 8 spots than an undefeated Big Mountain **** conference team or whatever...
Click to expand...

If you have a system with concrete bid qualifications such as win a BCS conference OR go undefeated in a mid-major conference, then whoever does those things is more deserving. I'm sure the proposal included concrete criteria like that and wasn't just eight at-large bids. The whole "more deserving team" notion is a byproduct of a stupid system that has no criteria for giving out bids to its championship.
 
LOL

BuzzCzar said:
you are like 12 and have no concept of the history of college football. you dont know what you are talking about. the BCS already almost went down.. just a few years ago

the formula for one of your posts:

controversial commment

unjustifyably bold statement of psuedo fact

statement that if reader does not (insert verb) with your comment that they can (insert pejorative term or insult here)

re-iterate the ridiculous comment arleady made with even greater mock authority

[then come back and post in response to yourself again within 3 minutes]
Click to expand...
 
yellowandnaked said:
A 11-1/10-2/9-3 ACC SEC B12 B10 PAC10 team is more deserving of one of those 8 spots than an undefeated Big Mountain **** conference team or whatever...
Click to expand...
Why don't you just look at the information that's already out there, EVEN NOW the highest ranked non-BCS team gets AUTOMATIC bid into BCS bowls if it's in top 12 ranking. Now look at the data:
08-09: Utah #6
07-08: Hawaii #10
06-07: Boise State #8
04-05: Utah #6
So EVEN now these teams outrank 11-1/10-2/9-3 if they are in top 12.

Any playoff will have its controversies too, someone complaining at the end. But the point is there will be less serious complaints.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top