vs. Boston College ATL Chart

PressManCoverage said:
Things I would like to see this week and for the rest of the Season:

No more snaps for #5 at WR, instead give those snaps to #26 that looked to have a high ceiling vs Pitt and then disappeared, maybe he's injured, Fans can never tell with these new Injury reporting rules.

On maybe 50% of the snaps or more play #9 at TE and use him in a H-Back-hybrid TE Role(Think Shannon Sharpe for the Elway led Broncos #9 is similar size 6-2 230), he is the guy that scored on a 2pt conversion a few weeks ago.

We need more offensive punch from our TE spot, and #9 seems to be sturdy and more reliable catching the ball, maybe he can give us some easy throws (improve completion pctg) and he can outrun LBers in coverage, it makes no sense to have a buncha guys on the TE depth chart that produce very little, on every level of FB, the TE is called the QB's best friend, let's make that a reality for our Offense also.

#76 has been ATL for a few Games, at 3-6 and reeling on the OLine maybe we give him a couple of Series to see what we have, maybe we also give #72 & #60 chances to redeem themselves (see I believe in 2nd chances).

In general, the time has come for us to start evaluating younger players in Game Action, especially along the LoS.
Click to expand...
Question: Does Malik Rutherford really weigh 138 lbs?!
 
BC depth chart. Not particularly big on the DL. OL is typical BC.

Screenshot_20211113-053258~2.png
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top