instant oatmeal
Varsity Lurker
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2007
- Messages
- 144
i always root for all of ND's direct opponents b/c it helps SOS as others have said. your team will possibly be in consideration for a BCS bowl and every little bit helps.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
i always root for all of ND's direct opponents b/c it helps SOS as others have said. your team will possibly be in consideration for a BCS bowl and every little bit helps.
Under most circumstances I would agree with you --I dare say that I probably loathe ND as much or moreso than I do UGA.
The only reason I am pulling for ND this weekend is because all week I've listened to the college football talking heads opinionate about what a long year it will be for the Irish --their offense is terrible, it's a rebuilding year, etc. I know that ND is down --but there has been too much focus on what ND may or may not be --and IMO not enough on GT's preparation and execution against the Irish.
If ND were to defeat Penn State then there might be a little more national appreciation for what GT did in South Bend. Besides, it's not at all hard for me to pull against Penn State.
Well, it does factor into the perception of the those voting in the polls.Again, SOS means squat now - except for bragging rights.
Again, SOS means squat now - except for bragging rights.
Again, SOS means squat now - except for bragging rights.
VT @ LSU
Miami @ Oklahoma
NCSU @ BC
Nebraska @ Wake
Notre Dame @ PSU
Duke @ UVA
USC-East @ UGA ;)
USF @ Auburn
VT @ LSU
Miami @ Oklahoma
NCSU @ BC
Nebraska @ Wake
Notre Dame @ PSU
Duke @ UVA
USC-East @ UGA ;)
USF @ Auburn
for USF @ Auburn - because the shame of the loss would shut up SEC fans for 0.00001 nanoseconds.
Well, (SOS) does factor into the perception of the those voting in the polls.
Right about the computer polls, but I soooo disagree about removing the SOS element from the BCS formula. The BCS formula was invented WITH THE EXPRESS PURPOSE of taking SOS into account when determining the NC game. That was the WHOLE POINT. And yet, every time it put a 1 vs a 3 and the 2 got left out all the journalists whined and bitched about it being "BROKEN AGAIN!" ... hell, if it's broken every time it doesn't put AP 1 vs AP 2, then why have a formula at all? Why not just put AP 1 vs AP 2?The BCS removed the direct SOS component from their formula (and good riddance, too - it was retarded), so perhaps to the casual observer it looks like SOS has been removed.
However, the computer ratings in the BCS are largely determined by schedule strength, particularly since the BCS disallowed victory margin from the computer formulas.
Why not just put AP 1 vs AP 2?
The BCS formula has sucked ever since SOS was taken out as a direct element.
Why not indeed. It has always been the right answer and screwy BCS formulae have always been wrong.