TipoftheSpear
Varsity Lurker
- Joined
- Nov 18, 2005
- Messages
- 428
Somebody explain these rules to me- both punts were clearly not going to go into the endzone themselves and would not have unless the nadlickers ran into them. The first one where that buttcrack kicked the ball into the endzone clearly falls under this section, but the second one where the retard had it it hit off his shoulders may not.
Any Team A kick strikes the ground and, after a Team B player bats the ball, it crosses Team B’s goal line, where Team B recovers it or it goes out of bounds.
Any Team A kick strikes the ground and, after a Team B player bats the ball, it crosses Team B’s goal line, where Team B recovers it or it goes out of bounds.
RULING: Safety. Batting the kick is
considered to have destroyed the impetus of the kick and imparted a new impetus. However, merely touching or deflecting the kick, or being struck by it, does not destroy the impetus of the kick (Rule 8-
5-1-a).
That sideline ref should be fired (big S on his back for sucks). He's clueless. The whole bunch of them were a bigger bunch of idiots than the worst of the ACC refs.
Normal GT rules in place yesterday. If we don't beat them cocksukers by 21, we've got no chance of winning by a FG. They're always going to find a way to hand them bastards 3 scores.