Am I the only one that doesn't think we'd beat BC

i am the only one who thinks GTkyle is a dumb*$$? jesus man, have you no confidence in your team?
 
GTland03 said:
i am the only one who thinks GTkyle is a dumb*$$? jesus man, have you no confidence in your team?
Click to expand...
I just think BC matches up with us very well and we had a hard time adjusting in-game. I didn't see much at the end that made me say "wow, if we played like the 2nd half we would have beat them."

Yes, I'm hopeful that by the time we get to the ACCG we'll be good enough to beat BC. You also have to expect they'll be better as well.

I don't know why you have to resort to name calling.
 
GTKyle said:
I didn't see much at the end that made me say "wow, if we played like the 2nd half we would have beat them."
Click to expand...

But you should have seen something (even as poorly as we played) that made you say "Wow, if we played like the 2nd half we would have tied them."

That being said, I think they would beat us 6/10.
 
I don't want to play them 10 times, just once more will do.
 
Kyle, have you even watched the replay?

If you have and are still saying that the officiating was fair besides two calls then you have to be the dumbest prick on here.
 
wesleyd21 said:
Kyle, have you even watched the replay?

If you have and are still saying that the officiating was fair besides two calls then you have to be the dumbest prick on here.
Click to expand...
I never once said the officiating was fair.

No, I haven't watched the replay. Officiating was bad, but I don't think it was the main factor in our loss. They doubled our offensive production. We were lucky to escape with them only scoring 24.

Again, why the name calling? I said I may have been exaggerating, but they'd probably beat us 7 out of 10.
 
The two main factors in our loss were bad officiating and inability to block on offset-I formation run plays.

IMO

Correct those two and it's a 60/40 game in our favor.
 
The tight-end killed us early and we adjusted late. I think we can beat them IF WE MEET THEM IN THE ACC CHAMPIONSHIP.

Bennett will be 30% better in that game b/c of his experience and if we get there it will show the team has gotten it together.

I believe our problems can be fixed. But I tell you it is possible we will lose to UVA and this point will be moot.

You have to take each game one at a time.
 
law_bee said:
The tight-end killed us early and we adjusted late. I think we can beat them IF WE MEET THEM IN THE ACC CHAMPIONSHIP.

Bennett will be 30% better in that game b/c of his experience and if we get there it will show the team has gotten it together.

I believe our problems can be fixed. But I tell you it is possible we will lose to UVA and this point will be moot.

You have to take each game one at a time.
Click to expand...
Ah yes, 30%. I calculated that earlier as well. You just do the line integral in the chan gailey coordinate system.
 
Ah yes, 30%. I calculated that earlier as well. You just do the line integral in the chan gailey coordinate system.
Click to expand...

I convert Bond into Polar Coordinates and integrate from zero QBs to two QBs.
 
We better stop before this gets into differential nerddom.
 
TechGator1066 said:
I honestly thought we would kick the crap out of them. I think I underestimated their D and was ignoring the fact that our Secondary is probably one of the worst in the country, which allowed BC to pick us apart.
Click to expand...


I don't get the seconday complaints. Our secondary played a decnet game IMO. We blitzed like crazy and put little pressure on the QB. There are maybe 5 defensive backfields in the coutnry who could have kep BC to 24 points based on the line pklay and the defensive schmes of Saturday night.

Our defenseive backfield including Clark played decent imo. they wree not great but they didn't have a lot of help and the one TD for 40+ yards Clark had very good coverage. It was just a perfect throw and a very good catch.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top