GT gets hammered for $300 of "clothing benefits", meanwhile at LSU...

Flywheel said:
What then would you have the GTAA do?
Click to expand...
Overall, I would lead a revolt, personally. Why 100 plus schools let the NCAA öööö them over while protecting a select few is beyond me.

Of course I wouldve pulled an OKeefe first with a planted spy.
 
GTCrew said:
Of course I wouldve pulled an OKeefe first with a planted spy.
Click to expand...

I would love for this to happen, but not for the GTAA to do it personally. Whoever volunteers needs to have no family or friends to be used as leverage.
 
GTCrew said:
Overall, I would lead a revolt, personally. Why 100 plus schools let the NCAA öööö them over while protecting a select few is beyond me.

Of course I wouldve pulled an OKeefe first with a planted spy.
Click to expand...
After the unc investigation, GT should’ve started a football players only class where each student was given $100,000 to invest and track and allowed to keep whatever they had left at the end of the semester.
 
NCAA: Since they're declaring for the draft and no longer participating with collegiate sports, it's OK.


...err....words blah blah something something something more words.
 
LSU said it was fake money yalls.....move along
 
texstinger said:
that ain’t it.

It is about being proactive.
Click to expand...
What would have been more proactive than the steps taken? Immediately reported and self imposed player suspensions in the case of the Bell debacle. Immediately reported and coach put on leave (and eventually fired) in LaBarrie debacle. We did what they say they want and in the end it didn't seem to matter one bit.
 
jts1207 said:
LSU said it was fake money yalls.....move along
Click to expand...

ED6G9utXoAIrYxb.jpg
 
While I agree there seem to be a different set of rules for different schools, I think we should stop referring to this in the past tense with STTE of "Nothing happened to them." They're currently being investigated--if they have current players who are determined to have taken money from the booster, they should absolutely lose the championship as we did. And even if it was just the one player, there should be real penalties.

Something to note: The NCAA prez Mark Emmert used to be the chancellor at LSU, and his stepson is apparently married to the current LSU AD's daughter.
 
gtfan088 said:
While I agree there seem to be a different set of rules for different schools, I think we should stop referring to this in the past tense with STTE of "Nothing happened to them." They're currently being investigated--if they have current players who are determined to have taken money from the booster, they should absolutely lose the championship as we did. And even if it was just the one player, there should be real penalties.

Something to note: The NCAA prez Mark Emmert used to be the chancellor at LSU, and his stepson is apparently married to the current LSU AD's daughter.
Click to expand...
Ok. Nothing will happen to them
 
They’re smoking cigars in a locker room, laughing at cops telling them to stop, committing ncaa violations in front of a whole stadium and giving 0 öööös. I don’t know whether to hate them or love them.
 
Akinji07 said:
They’re smoking cigars in a locker room, laughing at cops telling them to stop, committing ncaa violations in front of a whole stadium and giving 0 öööös. I don’t know whether to hate them or love them.
Click to expand...
I love it. You think Tech's gonna win a championship with all choir boys?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top