Our ol' pal beej67 delivers a classic haymaker to Dawg fans

JoltinJacket

► Ģŏ ʝąҁʞεɫʂ ◄
Joined
Oct 30, 2002
Messages
10,874
Just in case they decide to delete the thread:

PradoDawg wrote:
UGA #1- eat it, Tech and Mich St fans

And anyone else with anything sh*tty to say about UGA academics.
beej response:

Ummmm....
Slideshow: Colleges That Pay Off

UPDATE (December 23, 2008): After SmartMoney received an inquiry from another school, No. 1-ranked University of Georgia said it inadvertently provided some incorrect information about its tuition. As a result, No. 2-ranked Texas A&M moves up to the top spot, followed by the University of Texas (Austin) and Georgia Tech. University of Georgia falls to No. 4. None of the other rankings were affected.​
Apparently y'all were just the preseason #1 ranking.

*rimshot*
http://mbd.scout.com/mb.aspx?s=135&f=1073&t=3625420&p=4


Outstanding!!! :bowdown:
 
I am not signed up over there, but they keep arguing that all Tech does is educate engineers.

Can someone please point out that the M-Train is ranked higher than the UGA business school?
 
some Georgie dufus sent me that article as well. Even given the wrong data, the choice of Tech over Georgie is clear. this is b/c of some weird reason that the magazine chooses to use 15 years as the period of return, and not a normal working lifespan which is typically about 30 more years than that

anyway, here is my response to that Georgie dude:

Like a typical Georgie person, you didn’t even realize that you are proving that it’s better to go to Tech.
If only you guys could look at numbers and not think that they are something on the back of a jersey or something.

Would you rather invest $1 and get 200% return or invest $5 and get 100% return?

If you can do it only once (like going to college), then you would NET $2 with the first investment, but you would NET $5 with the second investment, even though the rate of return is higher. So rate of return is only one consideration. Clearly, you would rather make $5 than $2, right? Even though it’s a lower rate of return, you would (if you were smart) pick the second option.

So, let’s look at the REAL FACTS:
1. University of Georgia
Median Salary: 3 Years After Graduation: $44,100
Out-of-State Degree Cost: (Class of 2005): $54,742
Median Salary 15 Years After Graduation: $86,000
Out-of-State Degree Cost (Class of 1993): $14,450
Average Payback: 338%
Comment: At the oldest state-chartered college in the country, the most popular majors are business and marketing, chosen by 20 percent of students.*

4. Georgia Tech
Median Salary 3 Years After Graduation: $58,300
Out-of-State Degree Cost (Class of 2005): $59,896
Median Salary 15 Years After Graduation: $106,000
Out-of-State Degree Cost (Class of 1993): $24,684
Average Payback: 263%
Comment: According to Payscale's alumni salary survey, six of the top ten highest-paying college degrees involve engineering. Georgia Tech's engineering school ranks among the top five in the country.***

And now compare:

Georgie $44100 $86000
Tech $58300 $106000

Where would you rather be? Making 86k or making 106k? Now lets go ahead and make the return period not 15 years, but another 30 past that, which would be typical. Hmmm, 30 more years at 20k more a year…. So who has the better return for the period of time that it is actually likely that you will work for, instead of some arbitrarily short period of 15 years?

Also, this study (if you bothered to read it) only accounts for bachelors degree student, and clearly Tech has a higher percentage of students going to post graduate school. So that helps Georgie’s numbers relative to Tech

PLEASE stop trying to make it sound like you are better served by going to Georgie over Tech.
A)its not true
B)you just make yourself look stupid by insisting on it while the numbers don’t bear it out

All you are doing is proving me right over and over again.

Enjoy being ranked below us, in football AND in education!

TECH > Georgie
 
some Georgie dufus sent me that article as well. Even given the wrong data, the choice of Tech over Georgie is clear. this is b/c of some weird reason that the magazine chooses to use 15 years as the period of return, and not a normal working lifespan which is typically about 30 more years than that

anyway, here is my response to that Georgie dude:
WAAAYYYY too verbose! Allow me to trim it up a bit.
Like a typical Georgie person, you didn’t even realize that you are proving that it’s better to go to Tech.
I could explain it to you, but there is math involved, so you wouldn't comprehend it.
There, much better. ;)
 
I can't claim it took a lot of effort. They pretty much fell right into that one.
 
I can't claim it took a lot of effort. They pretty much fell right into that one.
Don't be humble, beej, that was a thing of beauty.

BTW, I did look at the link and it was obvious the numbers were wrong...typicall ugag, don't even know what it costs to go there.
 
I am not signed up over there, but they keep arguing that all Tech does is educate engineers.

Can someone please point out that the M-Train is ranked higher than the UGA business school?


Then somebody needs to log onto the Tech website and see all the degree programs offered. My daughter wants to attend after she gets all of her core at another college and she has picked her degree - a Liberal Arts Degree in History, Technology & Society with a minor in Journalism. That doesn't sound too much like an engineer to me! BTW, my daughter made the Deans List her first semester in college. I'm hoping if she keeps that up, she won't have a problem getting into GA Tech.
 
no luck for journalism minor yet. We do have HTS though. Maybe minor in public policy?

Also, you can't really skip GT because of a minor choice!
 
Back
Top