wrong board for this, but i never said anything about saving the world or any of the imaginary things that you invented in your head about me and my opinions like hating americans (i am one, btw)
secondly, while i agree plants could consume the CO2 if it wasnt the case that whereever people PRODUCE the largest amounts of CO2 is where they HAVE ALREADY DESTROYED the plants.
thirdly, while your claim of "only adding minutes fractional percentages" seems to be logical, it is in fact NOT logical b/c as you might note, things can react NON-LINEAR. Take as an example you body temperature. If i change it 1* that is only ~1%, but a few degrees change can kill you. Maybe (actually, likely) there is a "sweet spot" for the ratio of the atmospheric gases and a slight change in one could dramatically affect the balance.
fourth, while i dont necessarily agree with you about your characterization that "there is just as much evidence for cooling as for warming," i do realize that there is not perfect data, and there is conflicting data, and there is not enough data on the cooling/warming/whatevering. basically - i dont care whether the evidence for that exists or not. this is what does exist: higher rates of skin cancer, higher incedence of lung disease, higher rates of air pollution, etc etc
so, while you may classify me into some group that i dont really know, the fact is i am concerned with:
- low-level ozone in Atlanta where the weather forecast says "dont go outside today"
- significant increases in skin cancer rates
- higher asthma rates
- living in smog
- and all the other consequences that are already happening
these are all things that affect the QUALITY of life of humans on Earth, not protecting some species or talking about the end of the planet -- i think the planet will be fine, but i would like my kids to have a less polluted environment, and learn how to treat things with RESPECT.
IMO your dumb catchphrase is disrespectful