mm42
Dodd-Like
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2002
- Messages
- 4,030
^^^^ So then why is this abusive and horrible practice of granting scholarships to student athletes still in place?
What happened to your "it's not a monopoly" argument and your "good luck in court" challenge? Anyone with even half a testicle would at this point say something like, "Gee, my bad, I guess it is a monopoly."
With all these *awesome* decisions, why are you still calling for change?
These decisions are relevant to showing how stupid your "not a monopoly" arguments are. They were won or settled on the basis for which they were filed.
I'm calling for change because I think the improvements in benefits due to these legal challenges do not go far enough. That's my opinion. Your opinion doesn't matter, of course, since this is none of your business.
Before you launch into fabrications or strawmen again, I'm not advocating lawsuits or government intervention or UN peacekeepers - I would like to see the NCAA do the right thing for the players.
Gosh, I'm tempted to think that there are massive and critical distinctions between these clumsy case summaries you have posted and the debate in this thread.
Since you are too lazy to read them you'll never know.
By the way mm42, I thought you said that my suggestion that you were calling for gov't forced change of NCAA policy was something I pulled out of my "orifice." Yet here you are talking law and courts and so forth. So what is it? Forced change or not? Make up your mind. I'll check my orifice for foreign objects. (Settle down ArchiTECH!)
I never called for any such things - you made it up.
I brought up these legal decisions to show how retarded your "not a monopoly" and "good luck in court" arguments were. Man up.