Vad Lee Wins
Varsity Lurker
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2011
- Messages
- 220
nm
Because people like you re-post her articles all over the place.
Boom!
Hey Noob....We don't post her on here. Did you not get the memo?
Great comment by "Ordinary Citizen":
Heather, help me understand this. Coach Johnson was supposed to sit the two players in question out for upcoming games but he was not supposed to be told that these players were under investigation. The players were supposed to not be allowed to play because they were in violation of NCAA rules but they were not to know that the NCAA was investigating them. The President and the AD were supposed to suspend the two players for NCAA violations but they were not supposed to tell the coach that the players were being suspended. No matter how I turn this over in my brain I can't figure out how you involve yourself in a coaching decision without telling the coach.
I don't agree with her article but that comment is way off base. CPJ was not to be told before the player interview, which occurred ten days before the U[sic]GA game. After the player interview, Radakovich was free to tell whomever he wanted.
Too busy reading Vad's twitter.
Because people like you re-post her articles all over the place.
Boom!
Hey Noob....We don't post her on here. Did you not get the memo?
Dinich Blog is on par with Bleacher Report <--- Sounds like a good poll
Posting either should lead to perma-ban.
Too busy reading Vad's twitter.
Your first problem was reading a Dinich article. It's been well established that she is a five-head with less football knowledge than 95% of the free world.
If she didn't have a vagina, she would be writing for something similar to the Monticello Morning News.
Never link an article from her again. Super cereal.
What has Vad twatted lately VLW??
Mods please ban the OP. He has gone full retart.
Don't worry, I'll ban myself. I was already gonna commit suicide tonight anyways.
Suicide is a bit overboard for posting heather's articles. Maybe just a couple lashes is sufficient?
This is getting ööööing stupid, guys.
Told-gate = probation.
$312-gate = ACC title.
We could have coached the interviews all day long and not vacated the ACC title if the NCAA didn't rule a player ineligible BECAUSE of some bullshit impermissible benefits / preferential treatment. Alleged coaching of the interview is not what led to the player being ruled ineligible.
If you're gonna talk about ACC title stuff, the relevant parts of the investigation are impermissible benefits or preferential treatment or related agent-contactey stuff.
If you're gonna talk about probation, the relevant parts of the investigation are DRad's inability to navigate the NCAA psychic trap maze of arbitrary rules.
I personally implore each and every one of you to stop mixing these up.
Don't worry, I'll ban myself. I was already gonna commit suicide tonight anyways.
Interesting, because everything I read indicated he was never officially ruled ineligible. They THOUGHT he might be ruled ineligible at the time.
Do you know something we don't or is it the other way around?