2014 schedule

Is it fair to say that if we lose to Clemson, VPI, UGAg and Miami again, that CPJ will be gone?

EDIT: Isn't his contract up after next season anyway?
 
Most years it probably makes sense to play a few patsies at the start of the season. But this year it would be to our advantage to start with one of the big teams replacing a quarterback.

In addition, I love the off season buildup when you know you face a big game first. And I think it helps the players stay focused in the off season and the long hot days of early practice.
 
a5ehren said:
No, but it gets to the "extend him or you won't be able to recruit anyone" phase.
Click to expand...

The current class will get 3 seasons (without a firing/extension) with CPJ (2014-2016). That phase will start after NSD in February as the new class will be down to 2 seasons.
 
Wouldn't mind opening with VT or Clemson next season.
 
GA So L
@ Georgia L
@ Tulane W

@VT L
UVA W
Miami L
Duke L
@ NC L
@ Pitt W
@ Syr W
Clemson L

5-7
 
Valdosta_Jacket said:
GA So L
@ Georgia L
@ Tulane W

@VT L
UVA W
Miami L
Duke L
@ NC L
@ Pitt W
@ Syr W
Clemson L

5-7
Click to expand...

Actually I think it could get ugly next year as we clearly will be weaker on both lines. I think we beat Duke at home but Pitt away (weather?) could be a problem. I think we play NCS instead of Syr next year.
 
WracerX said:
We aren't great, but we aren't down to Chan levels yet.
Click to expand...

You realize we are 1 loss away from missing a bowl in 3 of the last 4 years don't you? That is pretty much at Chan level, possibly worse.
 
midatlantech said:
Actually I think it could get ugly next year as we clearly will be weaker on both lines. I think we beat Duke at home but Pitt away (weather?) could be a problem. I think we play NCS instead of Syr next year.
Click to expand...

It's hard to improve when you lose 11 starters, especially considering 8 or 9 of those guys are 3-yr starters. And yes losing 6 at the LOS is tough.

Luckily the schedule is soft early, so we'll have some time to ease into things. Hopefully the Tulane game isn't a trap, I read they are opening a new stadium against us
 
The Champ said:
It's hard to improve when you lose 11 starters, especially considering 8 or 9 of those guys are 3-yr starters. And yes losing 6 at the LOS is tough.

Luckily the schedule is soft early, so we'll have some time to ease into things. Hopefully the Tulane game isn't a trap, I read they are opening a new stadium against us
Click to expand...

They are also a bowl team now. Definitely a trap game. Hopefully they suck at defending the option, and it's an easy one.
 
The Champ said:
It's hard to improve when you lose 11 starters, especially considering 8 or 9 of those guys are 3-yr starters. And yes losing 6 at the LOS is tough.

Luckily the schedule is soft early, so we'll have some time to ease into things. Hopefully the Tulane game isn't a trap, I read they are opening a new stadium against us
Click to expand...

Tulane has one of the worst offenses in the country. 104 in passing and 102 in rushing. I'm not afraid of Tulane. (or Southern for that matter.)
 
Tempest said:
Tulane has one of the worst offenses in the country. 104 in passing and 102 in rushing. I'm not afraid of Tulane. (or Southern for that matter.)
Click to expand...

You shouldn't be afraid, and we should win. But we've lost to shhtty teams early in the year before, so anything is possible.
 
The Champ said:
You shouldn't be afraid, and we should win. But we've lost to shhtty teams early in the year before, so anything is possible.
Click to expand...

You referring to MTSU? That was in October after the second heart breaking loss of the year.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top